I am having my ceremony and reception at the same place, so I am not including a separate reception card in my invitation suite. At the bottom of my invitation I was going to put "cocktails, dinner and dancing to follow," but now I am afraid the invite is starting to look a little wordy. If I leave it off will guests just understand? I am including a separate insert with our wedding website which lists out the timeline and location for cocktail hour and dinner. Thoughts?
Re: Do I need to say "reception to follow"?
It is a faux pas to describe the kind of food and entertainment that will be provided. "Cocktails, dinner and dancing" is incorrect.
Remember, the reception is for your guests, not for the bride and groom. If your wedding reception is so unusual that "reception to follow" won't prepare your guests for it, then you need to re-examine your plans and see if they are really appropriate.
A sizeable portion of the invite list are, shall we say, entitled and extravagant. The kind of people who have 100 guests at a first birthday party.
The idea of a simple ceremony focused on the commitment/sacrament being made and a low-key reception would never occur to them. (And yes, they're mainly on the list because it's just easier that way. An extra quarter sheet cake and 2-liter of coke costs less than the ensuing feud.)
It is up to you to send a proper invitation to your very proper wedding. (Good for you! Cake and punch in the afternoon is very traditional.) It is up to your guests to graciously accept whatever refreshments are provided. It would be very rude of them to complain.
Hopefully that's still okay? We didn't want people to worry about having to drive elsewhere afterwards, and I feel like the word Immediately lets people know that they are not going to be sitting around for an hour with nothing to do waiting for the reception to start.