Has anyone ever had (or gone to) a traditional reception with dancing that didn't have a DJ--and if so, could you share how it went? My fiance and I really don't want a DJ--we just want to create a playlist and play it on the venue's speakers. My dad, however, is adamant that we need a DJ--I think he's mostly concerned about not having an MC of sorts.
For context--we are having a lunch reception with 75 people. There will be dancing, but I doubt as much dancing as at a night wedding. We will have toasts and say grace, so I'm not really sure what other announcements or transitions would be necessary. (We won't be doing the announced "entrance" thing.) We'll have a cellist play during the meal and then we'll switch to dance music and just invite people to dance if they'd like.
Any experience or words of wisdom?
Re: Reception without DJ?
When there is a dance band live, someone is their designated person for a few announcements.
If all music is recorded, some friend or WP person or relative will usually see to an announcement or dedication for special dances.
Always fine. What is important is to have a couple of different types of music in blocks of 30 - 45 minutes, not all the same. Some social or currently popular stuff, some more timeless romantic slow dancing. Keep in mind that there is a generational mix, and also that older and younger relatives will dance together, not just people with their own SO.
Great Aunt Millie does not want to dance with her great nephew to something with a driving beat, and pelvic movements.
Most didn't really work out that well. The advantage to having a good DJ is that they have the ability to read the crowd and change up the music selections on the fly to keep people on the dancefloor. But if you aren't too concerned with keeping it packed because it's an adfternoon reception, then the playlist may work out ok.
"Love is the one thing we're capable of perceiving that transcends time and space."