My brother and I are 22 months apart. I've already asked his girlfriend (now fiance) and son to be a part of the wedding. My fiance said he has no problem with my brother, but refuses to have him as a groomsman. He even told me to have my 24 year old brother be a ring bearer. Family is very important to me, but not important to him.
My brother and his fiance have both expressed that if he is not in the wedding, she will not be a bridesmaid. I've already asked my fiance's sister, and his brother will be the best man. I'm planning on asking my sister who I'm not too close to, but is finally getting herself in better shape to hopefully be a part of my wedding. If my brother is not a groomsman, he will be the only sibling in both our families to not be in the wedding.
My fiance is very stubborn and is now saying that if my brother is in the wedding, he will not marry me. I don't know what to do. What can I do or say to change his mind. I've already had to compromise (give him his way) on the date, location, time, and to not invite my ex-boyfriend, who is now a really good friend of mine. Is this even fair? My parents are paying for the entire wedding.
Re: Groom doesn't want bride's brother as groomsman
Unless he has a bad history with your bro, I'm confused about why he wouldn't just have him as a GM. Has he given you a reason? I realize that GM are his choice, but this really seems extreme and like a red flag to me, especially given his threat to not marry you.
I think of the bridal party as supporting both of us, not as two separate groups: my bridesmaids and his groomsmen. My brother is standing on his side, his sister is on my side, and a female friend of his is on my side. I've seen it this way in most weddings I've been to. I've been to one where there was a groomswoman, and that's fine, too. Does he have a problem with bro standing on your side?
What makes him feel so strongly about not including your brother that he would risk putting you on bad terms with your family and even not marrying you?
But if your FI gets hung up over your brother as a bridesman, I think you have a big problem to handle before you consider marrying him. He's coming off like a jerk.
[QUOTE]My brother and I are 22 months apart. I've already asked his girlfriend (now fiance) and son to be a part of the wedding. My fiance said he has no problem with my brother, but refuses to have him as a groomsman. He even told me to have my 24 year old brother be a ring bearer. Family is very important to me, but not important to him. My brother and his fiance have both expressed that if he is not in the wedding, she will not be a bridesmaid. I've already asked my fiance's sister, and his brother will be the best man. I'm planning on asking my sister who I'm not too close to, but is finally getting herself in better shape to hopefully be a part of my wedding. If my brother is not a groomsman, he will be the only sibling in both our families to not be in the wedding.<strong> My fiance is very stubborn and is now saying that if my brother is in the wedding, he will not marry me. I </strong>don't know what to do. What can I do or say to change his mind. I've already had to compromise (give him his way) on the date, location, time, and to not invite my ex-boyfriend, who is now a really good friend of mine. Is this even fair? My parents are paying for the entire wedding.
Posted by abbasangel35[/QUOTE]
I was going to suggest that you have your siblings on your side and let fi's siblings stand on his, but that bolded line really concerns me. I'd tell him the wedding is off.
Have him on your side.
However after reading the rest of your post I agree that the your brother being in the wedding is not the issue. I can only speak to what you have stated in your post, but your FI saying he would not marry you over this speaks very badly to his views of commitment to you and marriage as a whole. If he truly means this and isn't speaking out of anger, I would suggest you evaluate if this is a man you can imagine growing old with and sharing a life with. If you guys can't coordinally agree on the wedding party without him threatening to break things off with you- well imagine how the next 50 years or so will be. Maybe at the least consider pre-martial counseling.
I'm sorry you are going through this as it sounds like you are stuck between your brother and your FI who are both trying to manipulate you on what should be a happy time of wedding planning. Please keep us posted.
Will he let you have him to your side? If it's a no across the board and truly doesn't want to marry you if your brother is in the wedding, you need to get out of this relationship now.
You don't want to start your marriage with someone who threatens that about something so petty.... he sounds very controlling. Is this what you want?
It's okay to break off the wedding if you aren't happy.
You'll never be subject to a cash bar, gap, potluck wedding, or b-list if you marry a Muppet Overlord.
[QUOTE]I'm going to be a bit different here. My brother was a groomsman and my husband was welcoming and wonderful about it. To me the wedding party is a joint thing - not a her side, his side thing. I figure if we can join the rest of our lives - families, bank accounts etc - then it shouldn't be a big deal for a request either way on the wedding party. If my husband had been this rigid on a simple request I would have had to rethink my decision to marry him.
Posted by scribe95[/QUOTE]
Agreed. I don't think there's anything wrong with groomswomen and bridesmen, but the women in our wedding party will be bridesmaids and the men will be groomsmen, no matter whose friends/family they are. By getting married, we are combining our families, so it shouldn't matter whose "side" they are from. And like PP have said, if your FI is refusing to compromise with something like this, you might want to reevaluate your engagement.