California-Inland Empire

Do I need to have a fish option?

Hi gals, I am having Lucilles BBQ cater my wedding!  My original plan was to have tri tip, chicken, and ham.  They no longer have the ham option, and now they have salmon as an option.  Do a lot of people really eat salmon at weddings?  If not salmon, I would get pulled pork as the 3rd choice.  Thoughts?

Re: Do I need to have a fish option?

  • desi2002desi2002 member
    1000 Comments Fourth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    edited December 2011
    salmon is a good choice, its different. Not everybody eats pork, but i think the beef, chicken and fish are good choices. GL (And I looooove your catering choice! )
    BabyFruit Ticker Image and video hosting by TinyPic me and my daddy
  • JuneMaggieJuneMaggie member
    edited December 2011
    I would do the salmon.  I am not a beef or pork person, so I would go chicken if those were my choices, but I LOVE salmon, so I think that rounds it out pretty well! 
  • edited December 2011

    Stick with the salmon.

  • lauralazerlauralazer member
    edited December 2011
    Can't go wrong with fish, tri tip, and chicken.  I love your choice, just had their tri tip last night and it was DELICIOUS!!  Yum.
    Wedding Countdown Ticker image
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards