Wedding Invitations & Paper

Rookie question...

I'm sure this has been discussed already, but I scrolled back five pages and couldn't find it, and am getting conflicting information elsewhere...

We have no inner envelope, and I hate the "Mr. and Mrs. John Doe" thing (though I'll do that for a couple of the old-school guests).  So which is correct?

* Mr. and Mrs. John and Jane Doe
* Mr. John Doe and Mrs. Jane Doe
* Mr. John Doe
Mrs. Jane Doe

I think it might look kind of weird to have a married couple on separate lines, but that's what I've seen recommended in a couple of places...  Help?  I like the second option the best, but I don't know if that's correct.
This is a neglected planning bio.
This is a belated married bio, with no reviews yet because I'm lazy.

image
Sometimes I feel like people think that brides are delicate little flower princesses who get all dressed up and pretty for one special moment of their dreams, when really they're just normal people who just happen to be getting married. Things shouldn't have to be sugar-coated for grown-ass women. -mstar284

Re: Rookie question...

  • Ladies first.  Married on the same line, joined by "and".  If they don't fit, the "and" trails the first line and the second name is on the second line.  Do NOT separate a man's first name from his last.  So. . .

    Mr. and Mrs. John Doe

    Jane and John Doe

    Doctor Jane Doe and
    the Honorable John Doe

    The Doctors Doe

    Ms. Jane Smith and Mr. John Doe

    Mr. and Doctor John Doe

    Captain and Mrs. John Doe

    Doctor Jane Doe and Captain John Doe

    Reverend and Mrs. John Doe

    Reverend Jane Doe and Mr. John Doe

    The Reverends Doe

    That's all the variants that come to mind at the moment.  Note that Doctor should only be used for medical doctors - not PhDs. 
    DIY & Planning | Married 

    Married: 2010
    Mom to J: 2011
    Mom to H: 2014

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic



    Dresses may be easier to take in than let out, but guest lists are not. -- kate51485
  • I don't think Mr. and Doctor John Doe is correct unless they are both men.

    I think it's Doctor Jane and Mr. John Doe.
  • Squirrly, you're a life-saver.  This has been driving me nuts all day, now I can finally print these out. 
    This is a neglected planning bio.
    This is a belated married bio, with no reviews yet because I'm lazy.

    image
    Sometimes I feel like people think that brides are delicate little flower princesses who get all dressed up and pretty for one special moment of their dreams, when really they're just normal people who just happen to be getting married. Things shouldn't have to be sugar-coated for grown-ass women. -mstar284
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_invites-paper_rookie-question?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:cd062f89-8272-496a-b0ab-225e1f87acecDiscussion:66cf33eb-224c-4bfa-9b2d-2393c3f180a6Post:7822efe8-70ae-401a-b9cd-b8d1392e958e">Re: Rookie question...</a>:
    [QUOTE]I don't think Mr. and Doctor John Doe is correct unless they are both men. I think it's Doctor Jane and Mr. John Doe.
    Posted by cjohnsen2010@gmail.com[/QUOTE]

    For listing as a host on an invite it would be incorrect but addressing an envelope is correct per the sources I have. Two men would always be Mr. John Smith and Mr. George Washington.
    DIY & Planning | Married 

    Married: 2010
    Mom to J: 2011
    Mom to H: 2014

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic



    Dresses may be easier to take in than let out, but guest lists are not. -- kate51485
  • Also if you're going to do Doctor Jane and Mr. John Doe, you should put her last name immediately following her first -- she's not "Doctor Jane."
    9.17.2010
    planning

    image
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards