this is the code for the render ad
Wedding Vows & Ceremony Discussions

11am wedding ceremony? Do or don't?

Hi all,

We found a location to have a Catholic wedding ceremony. It's the Saint Paul Cathedral, which is my dream church! However, the only time available is at 11am! Is that too early? Our reception, which we have already booked the location starts at 6pm. I'm worried about all that down time and also if people would skip the ceremony since it's so early. Should I do it at 11am or find a different church? The different church is difficult because many Catholic churches are sticklers if you are a parishoner and since we don't live in the state that makes it a mute point.

Thanks for your comments!

Re: 11am wedding ceremony? Do or don't?

  • Why would you book a 6pm reception without finding the church first?  That just does not make sense to me.

    A 6 hour gap is ridiculous IMO.   My sister had a 10:30 mass, sit-down lunch at noon.   Drinking and dancing lasted until 5pm.    I would say 80% of the 265 some people were there till the end.  The dance floor was packed all afternoon.

    Honestly if I received an invite to your wedding I would skip the ceremony and just go to the reception.






    What differentiates an average host and a great host is anticipating unexpressed needs and wants of their guests.  Just because the want/need is not expressed, doesn't mean it wouldn't be appreciated. 
  • kaos16kaos16 member
    Knottie Warrior 500 Love Its 1000 Comments First Answer
    edited April 2013
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_ceremony-ideas_11am-wedding-ceremony-do-or-dont?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:10Discussion:97b2ed14-a751-42cf-9db8-933fc1b71b39Post:b278bd83-5193-457b-8413-489ff6b0f4fa">11am wedding ceremony? Do or don't?</a>:
    [QUOTE]Hi all, We found a location to have a Catholic wedding ceremony. It's the Saint Paul Cathedral, which is my dream church! However, the only time available is at 11am! Is that too early? Our reception, which we have already booked the location starts at 6pm. I'm worried about all that down time and also if people would skip the ceremony since it's so early. Should I do it at 11am or find a different church? The different church is difficult because many Catholic churches are sticklers if you are a parishoner and since we don't live in the state that makes it a mute point. Thanks for your comments!
    Posted by ujuobi25[/QUOTE]

    Even a Catholic mass is what, 1-1.5 hours long.  The ceremony will be over by 12:30.  That leaves 5.5 hours for your guests to hang around until the reception.  IMO that is entirely too long.  Even if they have to travel from ceremony site to reception site, that is a lot of downtime.  I recommend a different ceremony location if you can't/won't have an earlier reception.
  • itzMSitzMS member
    2500 Comments 500 Love Its 5 Answers First Anniversary

    Since your wedding is still over a year out, I'm sure you could change your reception to a lunch reception. Even if it means losing a small deposit.

    I had an 11:00AM Catholic ceremony with a lunch reception and it was awesome! We had a great turnout, too.

    p.s. It's "moot" point not "mute" point for future reference Smile

  • An 11am ceremony is fine...if you are having a lunch reception. So you either need to find a church with a later Mass time available, or change your reception time. FWIW, if you are having a Catholic ceremony, I think your priority should be the church and not having an evening reception. 
    image
  • Our ceremony was at 10:30 followed by a lunch reception. You want to have a gap of several hours?  What do you expect your guests to do during that time?
    What did you think would happen if you walked up to a group of internet strangers and told them to get shoehorned by their lady doc?~StageManager14
    image
  • Just say no to gaps!  Any gap at all is not appropriate.
  • Either have a lunch reception or find a new church.

    Or you can have a 5.5 hour gap and expect many people to skip your ceremony or your reception - or both. I went to a wedding like this two weekends ago and only 25% of the guests attended the ceremony and my FI and I left the reception right after dinner because we were tired.
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_ceremony-ideas_11am-wedding-ceremony-do-or-dont?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:10Discussion:97b2ed14-a751-42cf-9db8-933fc1b71b39Post:2e46ee72-4140-450c-a8d8-d8be954caa6a">Re: 11am wedding ceremony? Do or don't?</a>:
    [QUOTE]An 11am ceremony is fine...if you are having a lunch reception. So you either need to find a church with a later Mass time available, or change your reception time.<strong> FWIW, if you are having a Catholic ceremony, I think your priority should be the church and not having an evening reception. </strong>
    Posted by daria24[/QUOTE]
    Yeah, it's kind of baffling to me that you would book your reception venue before your church.
  • 11 am for a ceremony is fine, but long gaps are not. You might need to find a new church to hold the ceremony at or eat the cost of the venue's downpayments and find a new one.
    image
  • Gaps suck! I would call your venue and see about moving the time to earlier. With this much notice I bet they will. It probably will even be cheaper.
  • Thanks for the thoughts guys. Very helpful. We booked the reception because it was our #1 location and that was the only date available in June. As a physician, my schedule is pretty inflexible. We were hoping to find a church that would be accomodating with my schedule and did not think it would be a big deal since we are planning over a year and half in advance. We still have the option of using my parents' church, which my parents started going to after I left for college, although the FI and I would prefer the Cathedral of Saint Paul. Nevertheless, wanted to get a sense of what people would do in this scenario. 
  • In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_ceremony-ideas_11am-wedding-ceremony-do-or-dont?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:10Discussion:97b2ed14-a751-42cf-9db8-933fc1b71b39Post:ed67353e-c747-446e-95a2-0286d6021091">Re: 11am wedding ceremony? Do or don't?</a>:
    [QUOTE]Thanks for the thoughts guys. Very helpful. We booked the reception because it was our #1 location and that was the only date available in June. As a physician, my schedule is pretty inflexible. We were hoping to find a church that would be accomodating with my schedule and did not think it would be a big deal since we are planning over a year and half in advance. We still have the option of using my parents' church, which my parents started going to after I left for college, although the FI and I would prefer the Cathedral of Saint Paul. Nevertheless, wanted to get a sense of what people would do in this scenario. 
    Posted by ujuobi25[/QUOTE]

    I hope you take the PPs advice to heart.  A gap is unacceptable and incredibly rude to your guets.  talk to your dream venue and ask them if you can shift your reservation to an afternoon event. 
  • I agree with PPs that a gap is extremely rude.  I think you either need to find a different church that will let you do the ceremony at a later time, or move your reception to lunch time.
  • The answer to what to do in this scenario is move the reception or move the ceremony. We got married at 11am and had a lunch reception immediately following in our church's Family Life Center. It may not have been precisely what I had hoped for, but it fit our time and budget needs and was a spectacular event nonetheless.
    image
  • PP have given you great advice. You can't have a 5.5 hour gap. Either change the church or move the reception.
     
      Image and video hosting by TinyPic Lilypie First Birthday tickers
  • If the ceremony is going to be at 11am, you need to move up the time of your reception so it starts right after the ceremony is over.  A gap that long is really going to piss off your guests.
  • I agree you need the afternoon wedding or change the church.  As far as booking the reception first, honestly we are looking for receptions first because it's the one thing that really fills up fast at most places around here and it's the biggest cost of the whole thing.  However, with us we have looked at more venues that do both the ceremony and reception since I am okay with a non tradition location for the ceremony so I have plenty of options thus not worring about booking the ceremony place first.  I know to some it's the most important part but it's not for us.  We are all about the reception and getting to celebrate with our family and friends.  
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards