Alright, so I decided to plan a wedding in a month since my fiance (now husband) and I are both in school and didn't want to wait until summer to have a wedding. That being said, it was very small and we plan to have a party to invite all our friends who were not at the ceremony to come and celebrate with us. In order to save enough money to have this party, it is scheduled for mid June on our 6 month anniversary. I have a couple of questions about it, though. Since typically at a reception you have cutting of the cake, throwing the bouquet and garter, first dance, etc., what can I do as alternatives to come of those things since the actual ceremony took place 6 months prior. It just feels odd to invite people and not have any of that planned, but at the same time, it would be weirder to throw a mock bouquet and then do the whole cutting of the cake thing again... Thoughts? Ideas?
Re: Party instead of a reception at a later date
If so, then just throw a kick butt party. Have some great food, great drinks, and great music. Wear a little white dress if you want. But all typical wedding reception stuff just shouldn't be included because this isn't a wedding reception, it is just a party to celebrate your marriage.
What I think is ok to include:
- cutting of the cake (just don't have a typical white multi tiered wedding cake...tiered is fine but just not an all white formal cake)
- a dance between you and your H (just don't call it a first dance)
- dances with your parents (just don't make them spotlight dances)
What I think you should avoid:
- big wedding dress
- wedding party
- garter and bouquet toss (I hate those at weddings as well but that is neither here nor there)
[QUOTE]Yes, currently married, celebration scheduled in June. That's what I was thinking... Music, food, drinks... I was just not sure if people would be expecting something more closely related to a traditional reception. And I was thinking cupcakes instead of an actual cake to detract from the tradition of cake-cutting and also to be less formal with the whole thing. Thanks!
Posted by lenaglong[/QUOTE]
<div>What you're planning sounds lovely. You're definitely on the right track! Guests will base their expectations on the invitaiton fomality and wording.</div>
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: Party instead of a reception at a later date : What you're planning sounds lovely. You're definitely on the right track! Guests will base their expectations on the invitaiton fomality and wording.
Posted by kristbot[/QUOTE]
<div>Thanks very much!</div>
[QUOTE]You should have just waited the six months to do this altogether. You could have saved the money and planned it right. Then you wouldn't have these weird questions. Move on.
Posted by scribe95[/QUOTE]
That was just mean.
Unfortunately I see there is a group of mean women.Why they are not banned is beyond me?????
[QUOTE]Didn't mean to come off "mean." But I just don't understand why this was necessary - especially with a gap of only a few months. Why not wait and have the traditional wedding and reception and not worry about a secondary party and invites and what weddingy stuff is appropriate to include or not? Seems simpler. And again there apparently wasn't a reason except "we couldn't wait." Just bothers me in this immediate gratification world that people are making things more complicated than they need to be.
Posted by scribe95[/QUOTE]
<div>
</div><div>There are many, many reasons why someone would choose to do this. It's not your business to judge. OPs plans are completely fine according to etiquette. </div><div>My own parents eloped and then 5 months later my grandparents threw them a party. They eloped because of issues with my father's family- they didn't approve of the marriage and my parents wanted peace when they actually got married. My father's parents did come to the party later, but no other members of his family came. My father's parents weren't particularly happy at the party, but there were no major issues because my parents were already married.</div>
May 2013 February Siggy: Invitations