Wedding Etiquette Forum

Oh Lord, Kids? No Kids? Only our Kids? Just my Aunts kids... Jimmany. Help Please!

Okay, so my FI has a HUGE family and everyone has kids 2-4 usually. My FI and I are struggling because we want our nieces and nephews there and even a few second cousins but we really can not afford to invite everyone's children as well as the adults. I personally have already had a cousin refuse to attend if she could not bring her tween son. How do I convey, politely that certain families can bring their kids and others can not. This is really difficult. Any advice is appreciated.

Tommy & Tina 

Re: Oh Lord, Kids? No Kids? Only our Kids? Just my Aunts kids... Jimmany. Help Please!

  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • misshart00misshart00 member
    2500 Comments 500 Love Its Fourth Anniversary First Answer
    edited June 2013
    Only address the invitations to the people invited. Mr. And Mrs. John Smith". Don't include anyone else's names.

    Don't put anything like "no kids" on the invitation. It's impolite to point out who isn't invited to something.

    Also, you can invite some kids and not others (though it may hurt feelings). Most people here digest to invite in circles. Only nieces an nephews for instance.
  • I chose to have no kids (18 and up), invitations have gone out and no one has caused any serious drama or. I've had responses from "thank you, thank you, thank you - children are so distracting at weddings" to "that'll nice be nice for the adults" to "I don't get it, but whatever" to "what do you MEAN they're not invited? what should we DO?" (um, hire a babysitter?). Nobody has threatened not to come and I haven't received any RSVPs with kids listed - yet. :)  We chose no kids at all because 1) huge family = does not fit in venue; 2) budget; and 3) I didn't want hurt feelings with by inviting some, but not all.

    I would do all or none. It's the most diplomatic way to go. But if you decide to do just a few, I would advise you'll have hurt feelings regardless and wouldn't invite based on who you like/who's well behaved/etc. because it will end up in feelings of resentment and "what's wrong with MY kid?" Do it in circles - if you're inviting your siblings' kids, invite FI's siblings' kids; etc. You get the idea. 
    *********************************************************************************

    image
  • You do NOT have to invite all or none.  You don't even have to do circles.  "We are only inviting children we are close to" is a 100% legitimate cut off.  That doesn't mean there won't be hurt feelings; there may be.  But frankly some people are going to be butt-hurt if there's no kids at all, anyway.  Invite who you want to invite.  If someone's feelings will be hurt and you care that their feelings are hurt consider including their children as well.  Give extra consideration to OOT kids, as its very likely more OOT people will have to decline if their kids aren't invited.

    Now for my cautionary tale: if they *could not* come without the kids, would that be okay by you?  We invited family and OOT kids only.  That was, like, 40 children on our 370 person guest list.  A close family friend declined the invitation b/c his infant was colicky and none of their babysitters could stand him (though he was fine with mom and g-ma, but g-ma was out of town that weekend).  They had to decline my invitation and he still came to the church only to see kids all over the place.  I so wish I had included his children or that he'd told me why they needed to decline so I could have extended the invitation.

  • Maybe include nursing babies and no kids under like 10 to cut down on the list. You could include immediate family's children only as well.

    We're doing no kids at all.
  • I agree that splitting families is a bad idea.  My cousin invited me, my FI, and my DD, but not FI's DD - her reasoning was that FI's DD was not technically family yet...  By that reasoning, neither was FI, but he was invited...  She was 12 at the time, there were other kids there (younger and older), and she lives with us full-time, so to me it was very rude to not include her...

    Take care,
    Kim

     

     

     

  • Just invite those persons you are inviting and leave the names of any uninvited kids off the invitations.  Don't use "Adults only" because that's insulting to your invited guests.
  • scribe95 said:

    So you just said "the parallel rule for kids is to not split up families because they are a family unit." But by not inviting the kids that is what you are doing.

    Again, though, I am ok with adult wedding. I just don't like it done randomly, for instance, inviting some coworkers with kids and some coworkers without. To me, that means, I don't like your kids as well as I like their kids and is a recipe for disaster.


    By not splitting up the family unit she meant inviting little John but not little Suzy. It's totally okay to just invite the parents b/c then you're not inviting the "family unit" you're just inviting the couple
  • Jen4948Jen4948 member
    Knottie Warrior 10000 Comments 500 Love Its 25 Answers
    edited June 2013
    scribe95 said:

    So you just said "the parallel rule for kids is to not split up families because they are a family unit." But by not inviting the kids that is what you are doing.

    Again, though, I am ok with adult wedding. I just don't like it done randomly, for instance, inviting some coworkers with kids and some coworkers without. To me, that means, I don't like your kids as well as I like their kids and is a recipe for disaster.

    I think you and Liatris have different definitions of "family unit."

    She has "siblings who are minors," while you have "parents and siblings who are minors."

    Liatris has it right:  Parents can be invited without their children, but minor siblings should be invited together, especially if they are close in age.
  • You don't have to invite all kids or no kids. You CAN invite those you want. I agree with the PPs who liken them to any other guest, because at the end of the day, regardless of age, they ARE guests just like your adult guests are. I invited a few co-workers I'm close to but not all 100 people who work in my building. I also invited the kids I am close to (and that H is close to) without inviting every single child.

    This is different than breaking up a couple or social unit. That's why we say to invite all SOs. I also agree that I would not invite one child in a family but not the other child in the family if they were minors. I think if they are adults, you can invite one without the other, even if their parents are also invited.

    Not every event is an event for kids. Not saying weddings are NOT, but many people want them to be adult-only affairs and this is perfectly fine. Just like if you were going to a work holiday party, you are invited to bring your SO but very rarely, if ever, do they invite your kids. Kids don't have to go everywhere their parents go. But it would be rude to hold a social event like a wedding and then not invite someone's husband.


    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    Vacation
  • auriannaaurianna member
    Ninth Anniversary 1000 Comments 500 Love Its 5 Answers
    edited June 2013
    Ditto PPs that say invite the kids that you want.

    All or None just doesn't make sense to me. People might be hurt that their kids aren't invited... but I don't think that's really the hosts' problem. Children are not entitled to go everywhere their parents go.
    And if you have a friend or a second cousin who is bent out of shape because their kids aren't at a wedding but the bride and groom's nieces and nephews are? That parent has a serious entitlement issue.
    Or if there are kids (maybe not even relatives) that the bride and groom see all the time and are close to and they get invited, but maybe I have a kid they've never met? Who am I to ever assume that my kid, who the couple doesn't know, should be invited to their wedding? It's the same deal if say I were former colleague of the bride and haven't seen her in a year but maybe still chat with her on facebook, and then my getting upset if she invites her best friend to the wedding but not me.

    Not every relationship the bride and groom have with people is created equal and I think it's silly to punish them by saying they can't have their niblings at their wedding unless they want to incur the cost and possible trouble of allowing tons and tons of kids (which might then result in their having to cut adult guests they have relationships with).

    Always invite social units together (aka SOs). If you choose to extend the invite beyond the social unit to an entire family unit, don't split the family unit. Those are the only etiquette rules. The hosts of the wedding have full say over which units they're going to invite. And while it's important to be aware of possible sensitivities and the possibility of drama, and maybe it's in everyone's best interest (including the hosts') to stick to circles, I begrudge no one who doesn't.
  • Im having no kids other than my 2 nieces and 1 nephew I am really close to them its like having younger siblings so they are in the wedding party and i wasnt going to kick them to the curb after the ceremony so their mom  (the MOH) had made plans for her Mother in law to bring them home after dinner and a few dances. I put on the wedding website adults only reception and the invites were addressed to only the people invited i didnt leave it open like smith household or smith family.  If you want some kids there because your close to them put them in the ceremony and leave it at that. I dont feel bad about my decision at all.
  • We also did circles. Basically we invited all first cousins no matter what the age (age range 1.5 to 36), and left it to the parents to decide to bring the little ones. So far no cousins under 13 are attending. I also had a couple second cousins on my side that were minors (mid teens), but am as close to as my first cousins of same age. So far no issues. Wedding in 30 days!
  • lringue said:
    Im having no kids other than my 2 nieces and 1 nephew I am really close to them its like having younger siblings so they are in the wedding party and i wasnt going to kick them to the curb after the ceremony so their mom  (the MOH) had made plans for her Mother in law to bring them home after dinner and a few dances. I put on the wedding website adults only reception and the invites were addressed to only the people invited i didnt leave it open like smith household or smith family.  If you want some kids there because your close to them put them in the ceremony and leave it at that. I dont feel bad about my decision at all.
    It's still rude to point out who's not invited, even if it's not on the invitation itself.  You really should take it off the website.  The only acceptable version of this I've seen is putting something along the lines of "if you need help arranging child care please let us know"
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards