I was very disappointed with our wedding pics. I picked this gorgeous venue, Ranch/Winery, because I really was hoping for some amazing photos. There were a few okay ones of us, but I was looking forward to the art of it. I mean, you can't even tell we were at a winery, let alone a ranch. Would it be weird for us to take pictures in a month or so, I don't want to get back in our wedding clothes or anything, since that day is over. But I was thinking of wearing a cute white dress and having my husband dress a lil nice and having another photographer go and do a session at the place of our wedding.. What are your thought??
Re: Have pictures after wedding by different photographer???
June 2012 Bride!
Normally a B&G session is done within the first year of marriage and you wear your wedding dress (minus the veil) and your husband wears a regular suit (which is what my DH wore). It is not unheard of at all and is actually very popular here in Dallas. Trash the Dress is a bit different in that in that case, you don't worry about preserving your dress and thus can do pics in the water, mud, etc. I wore my hair different for our B&G pics and also wore different jewelry.
If you had a chance to do it, I think it would be totally fine.
With All the Trimmings
Doing a regular photo shoot at the venue is a nice idea also. There are no rules.
With All the Trimmings