Long-time lurker, first-time poster.
This isn't really
an etiquette-related question, but I'm asking here because you guys are
thoughtful and sane and give great advice.
My fiance
and I just got engaged (woohoo!), and we are considering what kind of
wedding we want to have. There are few enough people on our "absolute
must-have" guest list (<15, basically parents and close family) that
we could have a small courthouse ceremony followed by a nice little
restaurant reception. So that's one option.
Once we
expand our guest list into the "it would be great to have" people,
it grows to 60-90 - big enough that it would require reserving a
suitable ceremony/reception venue and planning an Event. Our friends and
family are scattered around the country, so most of our guests will be
out-of-town no matter where we have it. As a result, while I would love a
simple cake and punch reception, I do feel we should provide a meal and
entertainment. That's the second option.
My question
is, is the $20k wedding worth it? I know that it is possible to have a
lovely, tasteful wedding for 60-90 on a smaller budget, but it also
requires more time and planning than either of us want to put in. I am
not a person who finds joy in event planning. The venues that offer an
easy, low-stress package deal (that can be done in the next year) will
run us about $12k, so the whole shindig would end up being around $20k.
While
we can afford this if we really want to, I'm not sure it's the best use
of our savings. We make about $135k in a major city, and we have about
$40k in savings. We would like to buy a house in the next few years.
What
do you all think? If you had the tiny wedding, do you regret not having
more friends and family there? If you had a bigger wedding, was it
worth what you spent? What should I be thinking about that I'm not?
For
the record, I'm leaning towards the tiny inexpensive wedding and my
fiance is leaning towards the bigger, more expensive wedding.
Thank you in advance for your thoughts!