Hey Knotties,
From my understanding, a cake and punch reception is a proper way to host guests as long as the ceremony and reception don't occur during mealtimes. We were planning on doing this, but taking a look at the finalized guest list, it seems that quite a few of our guests would be flying in, or driving 4+ hours should they decide to attend our wedding. Is it still appropriate to host a cake and punch reception?
Re: Cake and Punch + OOT guests = OK?
An invitation is not a subpoena--if they do not want to fly in, they don't have to.
Edited: I was missing a word.
You are being proper, but can you put on your invitation after the ceremony details "followed by a cake & punch receptions at...."
This way your OOT will know that you aren't going to be providing a full meal and can decide for themselves if they want to come or not or can plan to budget to go out for their meal afterwards.
The sister of the same cousin had an awesome breakfast reception a few years later. I think the entire thing cost them less than $5k (no alcohol, no dancing, etc) and it was a lot of fun.
I also agree that I personally wouldn't host a c&p reception because over 3/4 of our budget is spent in entertaining our guests. When we have birthday party for dd our family travels 2 hours and I still feel like I at least can host sneak for them, be it hotdogs and burghers or pizza. But that's more a personal choice than an etiquette issue.
I agree. The wedding reception itself can be cake and punch at the proper time of day, but my inner hostess would want to serve more than that.
Edit: I added an unnecessary word. Silly me.
My BFF is having a small reception with some limited food options and heavy hors d'ouvres. They're having a "gourmet" grilled cheese station. I'm totally going to be standing by that table all night long and I am not ashamed at all...nope.
What time does your ceremony start and reception end?