Snarky Brides
Options

*Lurkers*

1234568

Re: *Lurkers*

  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:a48ed2ce-4db8-4c2f-92df-944196b3a8c5">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: *Lurkers* : You have said that quite a few times lately.  I get it.
    Posted by Blueyed228[/QUOTE]

    <div>No, I haven't.  I've posted all of 5 or 6 times today.</div>
    I french with my man
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers
  • Options
    Semi-creepy. Those two came up on the first page of search results.
    image
  • Options
    Wow, so many old people in that thread.  I miss some of them.

    image
    Everything the light touches is my kingdom.
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:cfa7ff99-7380-4f63-a561-b86a2c4f05b3">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]Wow, so many old people in that thread.  I miss <strong>some</strong> of them.
    Posted by J&K10910[/QUOTE]

    <div>emphasis on some.</div>
  • Options
    Absolutely.

    And also, when Girlie said "TJ" I thought she mean TemerityJane, not Trader Joes.  I was relieved to see it was Trader Joes.

    image
    Everything the light touches is my kingdom.
  • Options
    I feel very lucky to have several TJs close to home and work.

    OK, so no one answered my question to the dinosaurs.
    If you could ban anyone, and no one would know it was you, who would you ban? (Current or old)
    image
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:27c4e529-06f5-49e9-89af-f8a01bda4037">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]I feel very lucky to have several TJs close to home and work. OK, so no one answered my question to the dinosaurs. If you could ban anyone, and no one would know it was you, who would you ban? (Current or old)
    Posted by Matty143[/QUOTE]

    TJs coffee is the shiz. 

    I wanted to ban Cindy so much, but she only made trouble on E. 
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic 
      
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:27c4e529-06f5-49e9-89af-f8a01bda4037">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]I feel very lucky to have several TJs close to home and work. OK, so no one answered my question to the dinosaurs. If you could ban anyone, and no one would know it was you, who would you ban? (Current or old)
    Posted by Matty143[/QUOTE]

    I would ban TemerityJames in the times of old.  And Kiki.  Currently?  AllyChase, Acaponi, Chels, and then there's someone else that I get confused with Acaponi (she was a moron around the same time as Acaponi) whose SN I can't seem to produce right now.  I feel like there are a few more people, but I'm drawing a blank.

    image
    Everything the light touches is my kingdom.
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:4ca87e97-6b38-4154-9691-efed1e981bba">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: *Lurkers* : TJs coffee is the shiz.  I wanted to ban Cindy so much, but she only made trouble on E. 
    Posted by jcg98[/QUOTE]

    I like KEAN coffee. Its the guy that started Diedrich. Amazing.

    Hm. I don't know who Cindy is.
    image
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:334bbec1-627a-474d-9386-133f88ff8175">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: *Lurkers* : I would ban TemerityJames in the times of old.  And Kiki.  Currently?  AllyChase, Acaponi, Chels, and then there's someone else that I get confused with Acaponi (she was a moron around the same time as Acaponi) whose SN I can't seem to produce right now.  I feel like there are a few more people, but I'm drawing a blank.
    Posted by J&K10910[/QUOTE]

    <div>Argh, sorry, gonna be lame for a sec: but why TJ? She left TK about the time I started posting, and I never noticed you two getting into it at all. Then again, I missed a lot of stuff.</div>
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:334bbec1-627a-474d-9386-133f88ff8175">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: *Lurkers* : I would ban TemerityJames in the times of old.  And Kiki.  Currently?  AllyChase, Acaponi, Chels, and then there's someone else that I get confused with Acaponi (she was a moron around the same time as Acaponi) whose SN I can't seem to produce right now.  I feel like there are a few more people, but I'm drawing a blank.
    Posted by J&K10910[/QUOTE]

    Ill have to do a search on TJ. Kiki is on GBCN now. I cant remember what the sn is, but it says "the artist formerly know as robot legs" in her sig.
    image
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:7edcddcb-acb3-45c7-9bdc-cff2651b3f07">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: *Lurkers* : I like KEAN coffee. Its the guy that started Diedrich. Amazing. Hm. I don't know who Cindy is.
    Posted by Matty143[/QUOTE]

    If you see people reference the girl who looked down on any wedding without at least 25 passed appetizers, that's her.

    She wanted to have her account deactivated and decided it would be more fun to stir up stuff on E and have them ban her. 
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic 
      
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:9d2c970a-fe60-492a-938f-b959dca6a059">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: *Lurkers* : Argh, sorry, gonna be lame for a sec: but why TJ? She left TK about the time I started posting, and I never noticed you two getting into it at all. Then again, I missed a lot of stuff.
    Posted by arwo[/QUOTE]

    She was sooo fucking condescending and annoying and just really, really grated on me.  I didn't like her right off the bat, and then I sort of liked her for awhile, and then I waffled back and decided I didn't like her, and the longer she's been gone, the more intense I get in my dislike of her every time I talk about her, for some reason.

    We got into it just once, I believe--over whether or not teachers should be posting from school

    image
    Everything the light touches is my kingdom.
  • Options
    Well Dot, luckily for you I rarely post on SB anymore.

    image
    Everything the light touches is my kingdom.
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:22aefdb6-ffe0-4feb-8a99-452f2d195ab7">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: *Lurkers* : If you see people reference the girl who looked down on any wedding without at least 25 passed appetizers, that's her. She wanted to have her account deactivated and decided it would be more fun to stir up stuff on E and have them ban her. 
    Posted by jcg98[/QUOTE]

    Good times.
    image
  • Options
    However, we do agree on one thing.  I would be just fine and dandy with never seeing LDY again too.

    image
    Everything the light touches is my kingdom.
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:32dcada8-20c7-4b1f-860f-4d068210fd29">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: *Lurkers* : She was sooo fucking condescending and annoying and just really, really grated on me.  I didn't like her right off the bat, and then I sort of liked her for awhile, and then I waffled back and decided I didn't like her, and the longer she's been gone, the more intense I get in my dislike of her every time I talk about her, for some reason. We got into it just once, I believe--over whether or not teachers should be posting from school
    Posted by J&K10910[/QUOTE]

    <div>Eh, I can see that. What's funny is that I knew her from her blog, then I started lurking on TK and recognized her from the picture of her dogs in her signature. Her blog is definitely one of those "I'm not smart but I'm smarter than everyone I have to deal with always" blogs, if you know what I mean. Like "Whyyyyyy is everyone soooo stuuuuuupid?"</div>
  • Options
    I actually really like her blog, surprisingly enough.  I find it funny.  It's my sense of humor.  But her posting on TK I didn't like.  Maybe because she was too much  like me.

    image
    Everything the light touches is my kingdom.
  • Options
    I'd rather give up banning rights for the ability to see who lurks. 
    image
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:d4295e35-844a-4b78-8ac2-6800f4393614">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]I'd rather give up banning rights for the ability to see who lurks. 
    Posted by Girlie1030[/QUOTE]

    Oooh yeah. That would be better.
    There was a post on GBCK ML that had over 20,000 page views. This was semi recently.
    image
  • Options
    I wouldn't want to see who was lurking.  It would creep me out. 

    image
    Everything the light touches is my kingdom.
  • Options
    The sheer numbers would creep me out J but it would be fun to see if/when familiar posters lurk (Jas, Pivko, Kiki...). 
    image
  • Options
    I'm taking off now. Have a good night!
    image
  • Options
    I think she did briefly under a new SN Dot. 
    image
  • Options
    NebbNebb member
    5 Love Its First Comment Combo Breaker
    is this where all the bitches are?
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:6c13b907-cc1a-4037-aa16-1b8a5336821f">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]I thought Jasmod came back for a while?  Did she peace out again? 
    Posted by Dot Dash[/QUOTE]

    <div>She, like CCF, didn't get the attention they wanted and never bothered staying.</div>
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:23324095-ec27-4868-aeb6-50c858827d93">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]I never got what the deal was with CCF and her BF and the kid situation. 
    Posted by Dot Dash[/QUOTE]

    Moles and co-sleeping. 
    045_45-1 photo 045_45-1.jpg
    BabyFruit Ticker
    DX: PCOS/Recurrent losses/MTHFR mutation (compound hetero)
    5 hysteroscopies/2 surgical
    3 Inject IUIs = 2 m/c's and 1 BFN
    IVF #1= BFP. m/c at 7w6d. Needed 2 D&C's and scar tissue removal. Mild OHSS
    IVF #2 = BFP. Severe OHSS. 4 Drainings. TWINS!
  • Options
    In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_snarky-brides_lurkers-2?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:17Discussion:4f1f9913-7d58-4717-b9d8-421b88114d1aPost:8e3662d7-2b0a-4b7a-a7f5-b2f77f718de4">Re: *Lurkers*</a>:
    [QUOTE]In Response to Re: *Lurkers* : Moles and co-sleeping. 
    Posted by Blueyed228[/QUOTE]

    <div>and LOTS of oversharing.</div>
  • Options
    NebbNebb member
    5 Love Its First Comment Combo Breaker
    As big as I talked about not giving a crap if I got banned, I totally cared lol. I was freaking the fhuck out on FB.
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards