WHY ARE YOU PEOPLE SO OBSESSED WITH

jacques27 · May 2015

Back to the original off-topic topic - I bought dill pickle popcorn today. Also a bag of cheddar bacon. They are new flavors from Old Dutch. I haven't tried them yet, but I'm ridiculously excited. Dill chips we get around here pretty regularly though. For awhile, we were able to get ketchup chips, too, which I love, but I haven't seen them in at least three years. :-(

In sadder news, my favorite tortilla chips, the sweet potato ones, were nowhere to be found at Trader Joe's - I hope they weren't discontinued. I settled for the flaxseed ones.

theartistformerlyknownas · May 2015

photokitty said:

onefootinthebayou said:

ChemFanatic25 said:

justsie said:
Has anyone else had these??

ETF: image

The ceaser is freaking amazing! I om-nommed a bag in about 2 secs. I shared some with my boyfriend but couldn't stop myself from continually putting my hand in the bag and the deliciousness in my mouth.

Dumb question, why was OP banned? Her post was obviously ridiculous but did she say anything offensive or done something that violated TOS?
I wondered the same thing. I don't have TOS memorized but isn't it a violation to deliberately post something for the sake of stirring the pot? Trolling I guess?

I took a quick look over at the thread referenced over there and it's all so petty. They make fun of us, we of them. Internet comments at their worst.
This account was an AE for the OP. Her original account remains. AEs are a tos violation, they result in a warning and are banned.

Ooh, an AE for whom?

ashley8918 · May 2015

lolo883 said:

photokitty said:

onefootinthebayou said:

ChemFanatic25 said:

justsie said:
Has anyone else had these??

ETF: image

The ceaser is freaking amazing! I om-nommed a bag in about 2 secs. I shared some with my boyfriend but couldn't stop myself from continually putting my hand in the bag and the deliciousness in my mouth.

Dumb question, why was OP banned? Her post was obviously ridiculous but did she say anything offensive or done something that violated TOS?
I wondered the same thing. I don't have TOS memorized but isn't it a violation to deliberately post something for the sake of stirring the pot? Trolling I guess?

I took a quick look over at the thread referenced over there and it's all so petty. They make fun of us, we of them. Internet comments at their worst.
This account was an AE for the OP. Her original account remains. AEs are a tos violation, they result in a warning and are banned.
Ooh, an AE for whom?

Yes, please do tell.

doeydo · May 2015

AE? Is that like a second account or something?

louxnoelle · May 2015

The plot thickens ...

theartistformerlyknownas · May 2015

doeydo said:
AE? Is that like a second account or something?

Yeah, AE = Alter Ego.

TrixieJess · May 2015

hellosweetie1015 said:
Please ladies... I seriously am NOT trying to start anything or get snippy. But after the first reply to my first post was... " you gave her a job and pretended it was an honor. ...and pretended to respect her" ..... I was like WTH??? My friend insisted on being in charge of as much of my wedding as she could so I gave her something to be in charge of.
I didn't know about lurking here 1st. I wasn't prepared for what I took as getting jumped on and I reacted poorly. I just feel there's different ways to express ones-self to make a point.
Such as "if someone has 20 roommates and 17 of them think something is a bad idea..." It doesn't come across as if the person being address is being personally attacked.
Just my $0.02... ♡

Not trying to start anything either. But I just read that thread you're talking about. All 4 pages of it. All I got out of it is clarity about your teensy case of sour grapes, and an English ladyboner for @TrixieJess.

And I'm the most boring chip-eater ever, I've got plain old Lays.

Aww Thanks! And if you like plain chips, you need a good hearty dip. My favourite is Philidelphia Herb and Spice, I buy a bag of ruffles just so I can justify that dip!

hellosweetie1015 · May 2015

hellosweetie1015 said:
Please ladies... I seriously am NOT trying to start anything or get snippy. But after the first reply to my first post was... " you gave her a job and pretended it was an honor. ...and pretended to respect her" ..... I was like WTH??? My friend insisted on being in charge of as much of my wedding as she could so I gave her something to be in charge of.
I didn't know about lurking here 1st. I wasn't prepared for what I took as getting jumped on and I reacted poorly. I just feel there's different ways to express ones-self to make a point.
Such as "if someone has 20 roommates and 17 of them think something is a bad idea..." It doesn't come across as if the person being address is being personally attacked.
Just my $0.02... ♡
Not trying to start anything either. But I just read that thread you're talking about. All 4 pages of it. All I got out of it is clarity about your teensy case of sour grapes, and an English ladyboner for TrixieJess.

And I'm the most boring chip-eater ever, I've got plain old Lays.

Aww Thanks! And if you like plain chips, you need a good hearty dip. My favourite is Philidelphia Herb and Spice, I buy a bag of ruffles just so I can justify that dip!

I'm going to have to find a good dip. At one point early in my college career there was a creamy salsa on the market that was FANTASTIC on Ruffles, but it disappeared pretty quickly (I was probably the only person on the planet that liked it) and I haven't thought about it in years except wistfully in the chip aisle.

I just realized I could probably make it though... wow. I'm a dumbass hahah.

ETA: I just found a recipe. Took me two seconds. The recipe: Cream cheese, thick'n'chunky salsa. The instructions: Mix until blended. So difficult. No wonder I haven't thought of this before. *headdesk*

TrixieJess · May 2015

hellosweetie1015 said:

hellosweetie1015 said:
Please ladies... I seriously am NOT trying to start anything or get snippy. But after the first reply to my first post was... " you gave her a job and pretended it was an honor. ...and pretended to respect her" ..... I was like WTH??? My friend insisted on being in charge of as much of my wedding as she could so I gave her something to be in charge of.
I didn't know about lurking here 1st. I wasn't prepared for what I took as getting jumped on and I reacted poorly. I just feel there's different ways to express ones-self to make a point.
Such as "if someone has 20 roommates and 17 of them think something is a bad idea..." It doesn't come across as if the person being address is being personally attacked.
Just my $0.02... ♡

Not trying to start anything either. But I just read that thread you're talking about. All 4 pages of it. All I got out of it is clarity about your teensy case of sour grapes, and an English ladyboner for TrixieJess.

And I'm the most boring chip-eater ever, I've got plain old Lays.

Aww Thanks! And if you like plain chips, you need a good hearty dip. My favourite is Philidelphia Herb and Spice, I buy a bag of ruffles just so I can justify that dip!

I'm going to have to find a good dip. At one point early in my college career there was a creamy salsa on the market that was FANTASTIC on Ruffles, but it disappeared pretty quickly (I was probably the only person on the planet that liked it) and I haven't thought about it in years except wistfully in the chip aisle.

I just realized I could probably make it though... wow. I'm a dumbass hahah.

ETA: I just found a recipe. Took me two seconds. The recipe: Cream cheese, thick'n'chunky salsa. The instructions: Mix until blended. So difficult. No wonder I haven't thought of this before. *headdesk*

Mix a little taco seasoning in it and you have gold!

theartistformerlyknownas · May 2015

TrixieJess said:

hellosweetie1015 said:

I'm going to have to find a good dip. At one point early in my college career there was a creamy salsa on the market that was FANTASTIC on Ruffles, but it disappeared pretty quickly (I was probably the only person on the planet that liked it) and I haven't thought about it in years except wistfully in the chip aisle.

I just realized I could probably make it though... wow. I'm a dumbass hahah.

ETA: I just found a recipe. Took me two seconds. The recipe: Cream cheese, thick'n'chunky salsa. The instructions: Mix until blended. So difficult. No wonder I haven't thought of this before. *headdesk*
Mix a little taco seasoning in it and you have gold!

Mmm no, sour cream + taco seasoning + shredded cheese to make mexicali dip. Om nom nom.

redoryx · May 2015

http://boswellsbeanery.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=BBB&Product_Code=BB&Category_Code=DB

This is a company I've seen at craft fairs in the area and the dips are SO FUCKING GOOD. You just buy the powder and mix in sour cream or greek yogurt (my personal preference, only because it has protein so I can pretend I'm being healthy while chip and dipping at an alarming rate). The Golden Garlic is amazing. In fact, I should make some this week.

blabla89 · May 2015

Have we already talked about popcorn? (Sorry, late to the thread and didn't read all the pages, )

Because I could seriously get down on some kettle corn right now. Or moose munch. Feed me all of it, please.

photokitty · May 2015

ashley8918 said:

lolo883 said:

photokitty said:

onefootinthebayou said:

ChemFanatic25 said:

justsie said:
Has anyone else had these??

ETF: image

The ceaser is freaking amazing! I om-nommed a bag in about 2 secs. I shared some with my boyfriend but couldn't stop myself from continually putting my hand in the bag and the deliciousness in my mouth.

Dumb question, why was OP banned? Her post was obviously ridiculous but did she say anything offensive or done something that violated TOS?
I wondered the same thing. I don't have TOS memorized but isn't it a violation to deliberately post something for the sake of stirring the pot? Trolling I guess?

I took a quick look over at the thread referenced over there and it's all so petty. They make fun of us, we of them. Internet comments at their worst.
This account was an AE for the OP. Her original account remains. AEs are a tos violation, they result in a warning and are banned.
Ooh, an AE for whom?
Yes, please do tell.

Would love to, but calling out a user is a TOS violation and if I'm going to get one it would be for something better than that or someone worth getting one over

ashley8918 · May 2015

photokitty said:

ashley8918 said:

lolo883 said:

photokitty said:

onefootinthebayou said:

ChemFanatic25 said:

justsie said:
Has anyone else had these??

ETF: image

The ceaser is freaking amazing! I om-nommed a bag in about 2 secs. I shared some with my boyfriend but couldn't stop myself from continually putting my hand in the bag and the deliciousness in my mouth.

Dumb question, why was OP banned? Her post was obviously ridiculous but did she say anything offensive or done something that violated TOS?
I wondered the same thing. I don't have TOS memorized but isn't it a violation to deliberately post something for the sake of stirring the pot? Trolling I guess?

I took a quick look over at the thread referenced over there and it's all so petty. They make fun of us, we of them. Internet comments at their worst.
This account was an AE for the OP. Her original account remains. AEs are a tos violation, they result in a warning and are banned.
Ooh, an AE for whom?
Yes, please do tell.
Would love to, but calling out a user is a TOS violation and if I'm going to get one it would be for something better than that or someone worth getting one over

Huh, interesting. I have definitely seen mods share this info before. But of course, the TOS is intentionally vague, so "calling out" can mean whatever y'all (or the admins who play favorites) want it to mean at any given moment.

Le sigh.

blabla89 · May 2015

photokitty said:

ashley8918 said:

lolo883 said:

photokitty said:

onefootinthebayou said:

ChemFanatic25 said:

justsie said:
Has anyone else had these??

ETF: image

The ceaser is freaking amazing! I om-nommed a bag in about 2 secs. I shared some with my boyfriend but couldn't stop myself from continually putting my hand in the bag and the deliciousness in my mouth.

Dumb question, why was OP banned? Her post was obviously ridiculous but did she say anything offensive or done something that violated TOS?
I wondered the same thing. I don't have TOS memorized but isn't it a violation to deliberately post something for the sake of stirring the pot? Trolling I guess?

I took a quick look over at the thread referenced over there and it's all so petty. They make fun of us, we of them. Internet comments at their worst.
This account was an AE for the OP. Her original account remains. AEs are a tos violation, they result in a warning and are banned.
Ooh, an AE for whom?
Yes, please do tell.
Would love to, but calling out a user is a TOS violation and if I'm going to get one it would be for something better than that or someone worth getting one over

Aww come on, give us a little hint. Inquiring minds want to know.

TrixieJess · May 2015

@Hellosweetie1015, we also have chocolate dipped chips up here, so maybe you could find those...

theartistformerlyknownas · May 2015

blabla89 said:

photokitty said:

ashley8918 said:

lolo883 said:

photokitty said:

onefootinthebayou said:

ChemFanatic25 said:

justsie said:
Has anyone else had these??

ETF: image

The ceaser is freaking amazing! I om-nommed a bag in about 2 secs. I shared some with my boyfriend but couldn't stop myself from continually putting my hand in the bag and the deliciousness in my mouth.

Dumb question, why was OP banned? Her post was obviously ridiculous but did she say anything offensive or done something that violated TOS?
I wondered the same thing. I don't have TOS memorized but isn't it a violation to deliberately post something for the sake of stirring the pot? Trolling I guess?

I took a quick look over at the thread referenced over there and it's all so petty. They make fun of us, we of them. Internet comments at their worst.
This account was an AE for the OP. Her original account remains. AEs are a tos violation, they result in a warning and are banned.
Ooh, an AE for whom?
Yes, please do tell.
Would love to, but calling out a user is a TOS violation and if I'm going to get one it would be for something better than that or someone worth getting one over
Aww come on, give us a little hint. Inquiring minds want to know.

OK FINE, it was me. I really wanted to talk about chips, but starting a chip thread is just no fun.

photokitty · May 2015

ashley8918 said:

photokitty said:

ashley8918 said:

lolo883 said:

photokitty said:

onefootinthebayou said:

ChemFanatic25 said:

justsie said:
Has anyone else had these??

ETF: image

The ceaser is freaking amazing! I om-nommed a bag in about 2 secs. I shared some with my boyfriend but couldn't stop myself from continually putting my hand in the bag and the deliciousness in my mouth.

Dumb question, why was OP banned? Her post was obviously ridiculous but did she say anything offensive or done something that violated TOS?
I wondered the same thing. I don't have TOS memorized but isn't it a violation to deliberately post something for the sake of stirring the pot? Trolling I guess?

I took a quick look over at the thread referenced over there and it's all so petty. They make fun of us, we of them. Internet comments at their worst.
This account was an AE for the OP. Her original account remains. AEs are a tos violation, they result in a warning and are banned.
Ooh, an AE for whom?
Yes, please do tell.
Would love to, but calling out a user is a TOS violation and if I'm going to get one it would be for something better than that or someone worth getting one over
Huh, interesting. I have definitely seen mods share this info before. But of course, the TOS is intentionally vague, so "calling out" can mean whatever y'all (or the admins who play favorites) want it to mean at any given moment.

Le sigh.

Hmmm, I can't speak for others, but I know I have always held this position on not calling out users. Granted I have always been a bit of a rule follower and general PITA...oldest child, got it honestly

Honestly, I don't even remember who OP is - I can't take the credit for guessing this was an AE. I think the user hasn't posted in a year and created this AE to troll us, I didn't even recognize the name. It was a pretty anticlimactic banning - no one of consequences or even all that entertaining.

hellosweetie1015 · May 2015

TrixieJess said:
Hellosweetie1015, we also have chocolate dipped chips up here, so maybe you could find those...

I have had those. They were... Odd. Like, I looooove French fries dipped in a chocolate milkshake, but there wasn't a good balance there for me.

ashley8918 · May 2015

photokitty said:

ashley8918 said:

photokitty said:

ashley8918 said:

lolo883 said:

photokitty said:

onefootinthebayou said:

ChemFanatic25 said:

justsie said:
Has anyone else had these??

ETF: image

The ceaser is freaking amazing! I om-nommed a bag in about 2 secs. I shared some with my boyfriend but couldn't stop myself from continually putting my hand in the bag and the deliciousness in my mouth.

Dumb question, why was OP banned? Her post was obviously ridiculous but did she say anything offensive or done something that violated TOS?
I wondered the same thing. I don't have TOS memorized but isn't it a violation to deliberately post something for the sake of stirring the pot? Trolling I guess?

I took a quick look over at the thread referenced over there and it's all so petty. They make fun of us, we of them. Internet comments at their worst.
This account was an AE for the OP. Her original account remains. AEs are a tos violation, they result in a warning and are banned.
Ooh, an AE for whom?
Yes, please do tell.
Would love to, but calling out a user is a TOS violation and if I'm going to get one it would be for something better than that or someone worth getting one over
Huh, interesting. I have definitely seen mods share this info before. But of course, the TOS is intentionally vague, so "calling out" can mean whatever y'all (or the admins who play favorites) want it to mean at any given moment.

Le sigh.
Hmmm, I can't speak for others, but I know I have always held this position on not calling out users. Granted I have always been a bit of a rule follower and general PITA...oldest child, got it honestly

Honestly, I don't even remember who OP is - I can't take the credit for guessing this was an AE. I think the user hasn't posted in a year and created this AE to troll us, I didn't even recognize the name. It was a pretty anticlimactic banning - no one of consequences or even all that entertaining.

I believe you

My frustration is not with your interpretation of the TOS, but that fact that is is so open to interpretation, and intentionally so. Just last week, we had a issue where someone got a warning for something that they were previously told was not a violation. Frankly, it's complete bullshit that the TOS is specifically written in a way that allows for mods and admins to pick and choose who is violating and who isn't.

Anywho, this is sort of the same deal. "Calling out" can mean whatever someone wants it to mean.

It's pretty impossible to avoid violating the TOS, when it is as clear as mud.

VulgarGirl · May 2015

ashley8918 said:

photokitty said:

ashley8918 said:

photokitty said:

ashley8918 said:

lolo883 said:

photokitty said:

onefootinthebayou said:

ChemFanatic25 said:

justsie said:
Has anyone else had these??

ETF: image

The ceaser is freaking amazing! I om-nommed a bag in about 2 secs. I shared some with my boyfriend but couldn't stop myself from continually putting my hand in the bag and the deliciousness in my mouth.

Dumb question, why was OP banned? Her post was obviously ridiculous but did she say anything offensive or done something that violated TOS?
I wondered the same thing. I don't have TOS memorized but isn't it a violation to deliberately post something for the sake of stirring the pot? Trolling I guess?

I took a quick look over at the thread referenced over there and it's all so petty. They make fun of us, we of them. Internet comments at their worst.
This account was an AE for the OP. Her original account remains. AEs are a tos violation, they result in a warning and are banned.
Ooh, an AE for whom?
Yes, please do tell.
Would love to, but calling out a user is a TOS violation and if I'm going to get one it would be for something better than that or someone worth getting one over
Huh, interesting. I have definitely seen mods share this info before. But of course, the TOS is intentionally vague, so "calling out" can mean whatever y'all (or the admins who play favorites) want it to mean at any given moment.

Le sigh.
Hmmm, I can't speak for others, but I know I have always held this position on not calling out users. Granted I have always been a bit of a rule follower and general PITA...oldest child, got it honestly

Honestly, I don't even remember who OP is - I can't take the credit for guessing this was an AE. I think the user hasn't posted in a year and created this AE to troll us, I didn't even recognize the name. It was a pretty anticlimactic banning - no one of consequences or even all that entertaining.
I believe you

My frustration is not with your interpretation of the TOS, but that fact that is is so open to interpretation, and intentionally so. Just last week, we had a issue where someone got a warning for something that they were previously told was not a violation. Frankly, it's complete bullshit that the TOS is specifically written in a way that allows for mods and admins to pick and choose who is violating and who isn't.

Anywho, this is sort of the same deal. "Calling out" can mean whatever someone wants it to mean.

It's pretty impossible to avoid violating the TOS, when it is as clear as mud.

Pointing out flaws with the TOS is now a violation of TOS.

It is negative. Do not be negative.

arrippa · May 2015

MagicInk said:

ashley8918 said:

photokitty said:

ashley8918 said:

photokitty said:

ashley8918 said:

lolo883 said:

photokitty said:

onefootinthebayou said:

ChemFanatic25 said:

justsie said:
Has anyone else had these??

ETF: image

The ceaser is freaking amazing! I om-nommed a bag in about 2 secs. I shared some with my boyfriend but couldn't stop myself from continually putting my hand in the bag and the deliciousness in my mouth.

Dumb question, why was OP banned? Her post was obviously ridiculous but did she say anything offensive or done something that violated TOS?
I wondered the same thing. I don't have TOS memorized but isn't it a violation to deliberately post something for the sake of stirring the pot? Trolling I guess?

I took a quick look over at the thread referenced over there and it's all so petty. They make fun of us, we of them. Internet comments at their worst.
This account was an AE for the OP. Her original account remains. AEs are a tos violation, they result in a warning and are banned.
Ooh, an AE for whom?
Yes, please do tell.
Would love to, but calling out a user is a TOS violation and if I'm going to get one it would be for something better than that or someone worth getting one over
Huh, interesting. I have definitely seen mods share this info before. But of course, the TOS is intentionally vague, so "calling out" can mean whatever y'all (or the admins who play favorites) want it to mean at any given moment.

Le sigh.
Hmmm, I can't speak for others, but I know I have always held this position on not calling out users. Granted I have always been a bit of a rule follower and general PITA...oldest child, got it honestly

Honestly, I don't even remember who OP is - I can't take the credit for guessing this was an AE. I think the user hasn't posted in a year and created this AE to troll us, I didn't even recognize the name. It was a pretty anticlimactic banning - no one of consequences or even all that entertaining.
I believe you

My frustration is not with your interpretation of the TOS, but that fact that is is so open to interpretation, and intentionally so. Just last week, we had a issue where someone got a warning for something that they were previously told was not a violation. Frankly, it's complete bullshit that the TOS is specifically written in a way that allows for mods and admins to pick and choose who is violating and who isn't.

Anywho, this is sort of the same deal. "Calling out" can mean whatever someone wants it to mean.

It's pretty impossible to avoid violating the TOS, when it is as clear as mud.
Pointing out flaws with the TOS is now a violation of TOS.

It is negative. Do not be negative.

The first rule of TOS is you don't talk about TOS.

theartistformerlyknownas · May 2015

arrippa said:

The first rule of TOS is you don't talk about TOS.

I'm just quoting because this gif needs to happen again. And again. And again.

FrenchHouseCat · May 2015

Back to chips, I impulse bought some kale chips at TJ Maxx today because I waited in line for 20 min and I was starving and they were 3.49 (which is REALLY good for kale chips), and now I am eating at them at my desk, and they are mostly kale crumbs.

I'm very disappointed.

[Deleted User] · May 2015

And now I had to search for more Brad Pitt gifs

ashley8918 · May 2015

MagicInk said:

ashley8918 said:

photokitty said:

ashley8918 said:

photokitty said:

ashley8918 said:

lolo883 said:

photokitty said:

onefootinthebayou said:

ChemFanatic25 said:

justsie said:
Has anyone else had these??

ETF: image

The ceaser is freaking amazing! I om-nommed a bag in about 2 secs. I shared some with my boyfriend but couldn't stop myself from continually putting my hand in the bag and the deliciousness in my mouth.

Dumb question, why was OP banned? Her post was obviously ridiculous but did she say anything offensive or done something that violated TOS?
I wondered the same thing. I don't have TOS memorized but isn't it a violation to deliberately post something for the sake of stirring the pot? Trolling I guess?

I took a quick look over at the thread referenced over there and it's all so petty. They make fun of us, we of them. Internet comments at their worst.
This account was an AE for the OP. Her original account remains. AEs are a tos violation, they result in a warning and are banned.
Ooh, an AE for whom?
Yes, please do tell.
Would love to, but calling out a user is a TOS violation and if I'm going to get one it would be for something better than that or someone worth getting one over
Huh, interesting. I have definitely seen mods share this info before. But of course, the TOS is intentionally vague, so "calling out" can mean whatever y'all (or the admins who play favorites) want it to mean at any given moment.

Le sigh.
Hmmm, I can't speak for others, but I know I have always held this position on not calling out users. Granted I have always been a bit of a rule follower and general PITA...oldest child, got it honestly

Honestly, I don't even remember who OP is - I can't take the credit for guessing this was an AE. I think the user hasn't posted in a year and created this AE to troll us, I didn't even recognize the name. It was a pretty anticlimactic banning - no one of consequences or even all that entertaining.
I believe you

My frustration is not with your interpretation of the TOS, but that fact that is is so open to interpretation, and intentionally so. Just last week, we had a issue where someone got a warning for something that they were previously told was not a violation. Frankly, it's complete bullshit that the TOS is specifically written in a way that allows for mods and admins to pick and choose who is violating and who isn't.

Anywho, this is sort of the same deal. "Calling out" can mean whatever someone wants it to mean.

It's pretty impossible to avoid violating the TOS, when it is as clear as mud.
Pointing out flaws with the TOS is now a violation of TOS.

It is negative. Do not be negative.

Never fear! I'm sure i'll be ignored or scolded. The hateboner is real.

ETA oh, and

sophhabobopha · May 2015

AlisonM23 said:
And now I had to search for more Brad Pitt gifs

KnotHolly · May 2015

Hi all,

We've noticed some users sharing feedback that the TOU is not entirely clear. I want to let you know that creating more direct TOU is something we are working on addressing, so that there is less confusion in the future.

Thank you so much,
KH

[Deleted User] · May 2015

.

ashley8918 · May 2015

KnotHolly said:
Hi all,

We've noticed some users sharing feedback that the TOU is not entirely clear. I want to let you know that creating more direct TOU is something we are working on addressing, so that there is less confusion in the future.

Thank you so much,

KH

The TOS?

WHY ARE YOU PEOPLE SO OBSESSED WITH

Re: WHY ARE YOU PEOPLE SO OBSESSED WITH

Choose Another Board

Search Boards