Wedding Etiquette Forum

Zombie etiquette?

Can someone please explain zombie thread etiquette? I know it's different from TK rules for automatically closing threads, but I don't know the cutoff...is it dead after two weeks inactive? A month?

Personally, I try not to post on something after a few days because I don't want to be called out, but I think some clarity on what "old" is would help us newer members.
«1

Re: Zombie etiquette?

  • There isn't really a set time.   Unofficially if it's older than 6 months the mods will close the thread.

      Although I side-eye random responses more than 3 weeks out.  If it's the OP or someone else who has been MIA  and finally came back to answer a question/give an update then I'm good.






    What differentiates an average host and a great host is anticipating unexpressed needs and wants of their guests.  Just because the want/need is not expressed, doesn't mean it wouldn't be appreciated. 
  • I side eye responses to threads that are more than 2-3 weeks old, but I consider a zombie thread one that is more than 3 months, or one that is obsolete (ex: Bride comes with a problem for her wedding that's in 14 days, and now it's two months later and some random is commenting on the thread, obviously without reading it). I don't mind when the OP comes to update months later.  I love hearing follow-up stories.  


    image
  • With all the newbie brides coming onto the Knot, I think this is an excellent topic.  It has been bothering me that three month old threads are being resurrected for no good reason.
    Thanks for bringing this up.
    httpiimgurcomTCCjW0wjpg
  • Way back, I requested the auto-close - and (shocking) it was implemented!  I think they auto-close after 6 months though.  Generally, I don't think most threads should be closed just because someone comments on it a month or so later.  If that's shunned upon, the TK gods should change the auto close from 6 months to 1 month (or whatever).   Mods, can that request be put in?
  • Auto close after 1 month seems WAY too early. Just let the thread die and go off on a another page....but 1 month is just...no I don't agree. I personally don't even like auto-closing after 6 months, but I understand the reasons behind it.



  • banana468 said:
    Am I the only one who thought this could be a post about zombies?
    No....I definitely thought it was going to be about...some sort of zombie run type of situation or who knows!



  • banana468 said:
    Am I the only one who thought this could be a post about zombies?
    No.  I thought it was going to be about how you are supposed to treat zombies at parties or what not.  Hence why I clicked on it because I wanted to know who had a person in their lives that believed they were a zombie.

  • labro said:


    banana468 said:

    Am I the only one who thought this could be a post about zombies?

    No....I definitely thought it was going to be about...some sort of zombie run type of situation or who knows!

    I thought that too at first and wondered if it might be some kind of spoof, but it's on a legitimate topic.

    That said, real wedding zombie etiquette discussions could get interesting...
  • banana468 said:

    Am I the only one who thought this could be a post about zombies?

    I may have named it with an eye to get really new newbies to click on it. ;)
  • Am I the only one who thought this could be a post about zombies?
    I may have named it with an eye to get really new newbies to click on it. ;)
    I honestly thought, "Is this where things are going?   Are we having a Friday thread in case Walking Dead turns into reality TV?" 
  • I care slightly less about the time, but if a thread has fallen off the first page of the board I don't understand why people post on it at all.
    This is where I am too.  First page threads are okay.  Some boards are slower than others and a thread that hasn't been commented on in a month may still be valid and helpful to participants and lurkers alike.  And with some of the more busy boards, a thread that hasn't been commented on in a week is old news unless the OP is coming back with an update.
  • I just saw my first trailer for Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. I figured it was a spinoff from that. Those ladies are wearing such proper dresses while they kick butt.
  • banana468 said:
    Am I the only one who thought this could be a post about zombies?
    I may have named it with an eye to get really new newbies to click on it. ;)
    I honestly thought, "Is this where things are going?   Are we having a Friday thread in case Walking Dead turns into reality TV?" 

    Why not?  It's not like we can FFF anymore!
  • Well, there are some pretty well established rules around zombies, so.....
                 
  • TBH, it doesn't really bother me.  I don't think commenting on old threads is particularly useful, but I don't feel the need to call people out for doing so.  If I'm not interested, I move on.  It's TK, there's almost always something better coming down the pike.
  • Heffalump said:

    TBH, it doesn't really bother me.  I don't think commenting on old threads is particularly useful, but I don't feel the need to call people out for doing so.  If I'm not interested, I move on.  It's TK, there's almost always something better coming down the pike.

    This. It's not useful but not super bothersome. I'll personally try and avoid replying to threads not on the first page, as a rule of thumb.


    Daisypath Anniversary tickers Daisypath Anniversary tickers



  • edited January 2016
     Oops! I didn't realize there was a rule about this. My bad. I just responded to a thread in "Wedding Party" board that was posted in October. I didn't realize it was bad etiquette.

    The more you know.  

  • Jen4948 said:

    labro said:


    banana468 said:

    Am I the only one who thought this could be a post about zombies?

    No....I definitely thought it was going to be about...some sort of zombie run type of situation or who knows!
    I thought that too at first and wondered if it might be some kind of spoof, but it's on a legitimate topic.

    That said, real wedding zombie etiquette discussions could get interesting...

    So if a zombie has a gf, do we need to invite her if she poses a physical threat to the guests? 

    Only if she plans to take over their souls.
  • With all the crazies out there, I'm sure someone has had a zombie themed wedding! 
    ....but, IT'S MY DAAAAY!! I mean NIGHT!
    httpiimgurcomTCCjW0wjpg
  • I think my zombie friend is probably going to return to the grave before my wedding. I sent them an STD, but should I bother with an invite? I'm over capacity on my reception anyway, Help! 
    ________________________________


  •  Oops! I didn't realize there was a rule about this. My bad. I just responded to a thread in "Wedding Party" board that was posted in October. I didn't realize it was bad etiquette.

    The more you know.  
    Yeah, you're totally going to get spanked for that one.  It was the "blue hair" thread right?  Totally spanked.
  • labro said:
    Auto close after 1 month seems WAY too early. Just let the thread die and go off on a another page....but 1 month is just...no I don't agree. I personally don't even like auto-closing after 6 months, but I understand the reasons behind it.
    I agree, I think 1 month is a little too soon.  But as soon as someone shouts zombie thread, a mod will come in and close it.  If that's the case, then why not have autoclose?  Otherwise, it's mods just picking and choosing what to close based on whoever shouts zombie.

    I just think whatever the decision is regarding time limits, it should be standardized (and autoclosed) so mods are not closing threads because a user is annoyed that something was resurrected.
  • Unless the board is super hot, I agree with the "past the 1st page" "rule". 

    Sometimes people post questions months in advance of their wedding, and perhaps another poster stumbles upon and has personal experience with the question- that is still helpful, even if the post has been "dead" for awhile.

    But I agree that's annoying when a post from last year gets dragged up, or a post where the wedding has already happened. Mostly because I usually check to see what's "new", and if old thread get resurrected, it gets confusing.  
  • banana468 said:

    Am I the only one who thought this could be a post about zombies?

    I was a little disappointed when I opened it at first
  • banana468 said:
    Am I the only one who thought this could be a post about zombies?

                        


    Daisypath Anniversary tickers
  • @tigerlily6

    LMAO! You win. 
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards