Can you let me know your opinion on this and if I am breeching any sort of etiquette.
Our budget has limited us to 200 guests. We mailed out Save the Dates a month of two ago to a list of 200, mostly family. However we feel that some people may not be able to make it. If they respond back to us before the invitations are mailed we hoped to include some more people (neighbors, co-workers) etc. to take their spots. These people will receive an invite only and not neccessarily a Save-the-Date. (All of the actual invites will go out at the same time)
Is this okay? I am a little confused on this.
Re: Save the Dates vs. Invite List
But just because someone tells you they won't be coming, don't count that as a no until you have that RSVP in your hand. They may change their mind.
People's plans can change and even if they tell you now that they can't make it, you still need to send an invite.
Books read in 2012: 21/50
If you really want, you can do A-list and B-list invites....you set one RSVP date early enough that if you get a lot of negative replies, you still have time to mail invites to, and hear back from, your B-list. Just be aware that if people found out they were B-listed (like, if they compare RSVP dates with an A-lister), they might be a little miffed. I would be.
But yeah, everyone who gest a save-the-date gets an invite, even if they verbally tell you they can't make it.
That said, if your question is just about whether it's ok to only send STDs to some people, the answer is yes. It's fine to send invitations out to more people than you sent STDs to.
Married bio
Pro pics
Travel and expat life blog
So if you send an STD then you must send an invite, even if they told you they cannot make it.
You don't have to send an STD to your whole guest list though.
[QUOTE]Don't know that i understand your question. People generally don't respond to save-the-dates, but even if they do you still send them an invitation in case their plans change. <strong>If you really want, you can do A-list and B-list invites....you set one RSVP date early enough that if you get a lot of negative replies, you still have time to mail invites to, and hear back from, your B-list. </strong> Just be aware that if people found out they were B-listed (like, if they compare RSVP dates with an A-lister), they might be a little miffed. I would be. But yeah, everyone who gest a save-the-date gets an invite, even if they verbally tell you they can't make it.
Posted by Avion22[/QUOTE]
Don't do this. It's horribly rude to everyone and completely against proper etiquette. Just invite the number your budget allows and leave it at that.
People don't reply to a save-a-date. If they do you still send an invite, because closer to the wedding they might be able to come (if their plans change).
A save the date is not necessary, so you can send invites to people you didn't send save-the dates to. But be careful don't invite too many people.
Planning Bio
Married 9/15/11
*This is Not Legal Advice*
Planning Bio
Married 9/15/11
*This is Not Legal Advice*
However, it's not okay to expect people who have given tentative STD responses to keep to their answer. And you'll still need to send formal invitations to everyone who received an STD.
Our wedding date is November 12, 2011
RSVP Date October 12th, 2011
Fatty Blog