FFF

Beachy730

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:d15eeb76-1f8e-4b10-880f-d4702072b1f0">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : It's one thing to have dreams. It's another thing to go buy your flooring the week after bitching about your garage flooding. Again. Anyway, we can agree to disagree.
Posted by specialk84[/QUOTE]

<div>Ok well I didn't know he went and bought flooring.  That is just dumb.  I thought you just meant he had dreams of doing it.  </div>

emilyinchile

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:7d738b78-cce8-44fe-a22a-09b0f737fc9a">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]I never said it came across that way to everyone. Just speaking for myself there. I can't think of anyone of the top of my head who has 3-4 pictures of their SO in their sig. It's the multiples of it that get to me.
Posted by midgetthemighty[/QUOTE]

<div>You said that's how it comes across. You didn't qualify by saying that's how it comes across to you. Which sounds like you're saying objectively, that's how it comes across when in fact, you were only sharing your (minority) opinion.</div><div>
</div><div>I don't think that any sig involving an engagment ring on a wedding website has anything to do with any other poster or her ring, and I think it indicates a certain level of self-centeredness that you'd take it that way.</div>

chrmun

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:f3a32565-a671-41f8-86ec-6a378b137dd6">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : Chrmn is real. I know this because we are FB friends.  Everyone with a FB is totally real!!!
Posted by Megbo2012[/QUOTE]

This is a true fact that is true.  I do have a secret identity, but I only use it for fighting crime.

shadowkat08

Am I allowed to flame myself for not knowing what FFF stands for? I'm assuming one F is Flame, and another is Friday, but I'm stuck on the last one.

specialk84

I get that Alabaster said some horrible things on BNOTB, but so did a bunch of other people. Why was she the only one banned?

srfgirlie5

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:85cb6991-c140-4780-89c6-dc102cde74a5">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]Am I allowed to flame myself for not knowing what FFF stands for? I'm assuming one F is Flame, and another is Friday, but I'm stuck on the last one.
Posted by shadowkat08[/QUOTE]

freely

Beachy730

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:2240c336-5b6b-4dd2-ad88-16c086be9748">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : Yes I did do those because I posted more on my monthly more than anywhere else. I got bored/annoyed with having the same kind of picture in my sig as everyone else so I stopped doing them. Just started doing what I wanted. It's Marty Brennaman and I'm just excited for baseball season to start.
Posted by midgetthemighty[/QUOTE]

<div>I'm offended by how many different Reds logos you have in your sig.  It comes across as very "I think my team is better than yours."  </div>

dumdumfroggie

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:3f15459a-b9aa-4211-8587-b88aca3878b3">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : Because I'm sleep deprived, I'm extra slow today.  When I first read this, I thought "Um.... I think that's her fiance'."  Then I remembered there was a second guy in Midge's sig pic.
Posted by djhar[/QUOTE]

<div>I thought the same thing DJ.</div>

midgetthemighty

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:c9368986-32f7-4a58-b144-11dd5886ae0a">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : You said that's how it comes across. You didn't qualify by saying that's how it comes across to you. Which sounds like you're saying objectively, that's how it comes across when in fact, you were only sharing your (minority) opinion. I don't think that any sig involving an engagment ring on a wedding website has anything to do with any other poster or her ring, and <strong>I think it indicates a certain level of self-centeredness that you'd take it that way.
</strong>Posted by emilyinchile[/QUOTE]

Woah. I disagree but I don't know how much good that does considering <em>no one</em> thinks of themselves as self-centered.

chrmun

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:8f037b5c-9df0-4b74-adce-90c29b8d2e7a">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : But the important question is does your crime-fighting secret identity use a cape?
Posted by Holly4212011[/QUOTE]

Nooooooo.  Capes are kind of, well, gay.  And y'know, it's not like there's anything WRONG with being gay, it's just that I'd rather be the crime fighter that just happens to be gay than the gay crime fighter.  So, no cape.  Also, I had to change my catch phrase away from "Biitch, please!"

specialk84

Holly, didn't you send Ranch a Christmas card?

Megbo2012

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:3460f6fa-5e27-4aab-b8d3-231add9d3ee8">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : I'm offended by how many different Reds logos you have in your sig.  It comes across as very "I think my team is better than yours."  
Posted by dnbeach12[/QUOTE]

<div>Not the same thing.  Honestly, I think having your ring in your sig is dumb.  It's not for me, probably because I could not care less about them.  But when people AW their rings it's eyerolly. (to ME in case that wasn't clear.)</div><div>
</div><div>
</div>

emilyinchile

I'm going to put a picture of H with Magic Johnson, H with his Pan American Games medal and two pictures of my e-ring in my sig. Just to be clear about how amazing I think I am.

emilyinchile

Midge, essentially what you've said is that you think someone having a lot of pictures of HER OWN ring must really mean that she's sending a message about you. Isn't that self-centered?

chrmun

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:b22978b6-c942-4b75-b292-396c4e5d7461">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : Can we compromise on wearing underwear on top of your pants then?  I'll even allow boxers.
Posted by Holly4212011[/QUOTE]

No can do.  I do that in my regular life, so if I did that in my secret identity, people would know it's me.

midgetthemighty

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:1c2fe83d-35a3-43d0-80b6-e3067bf5c428">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : Nooooooo.  Capes are kind of, well, gay.  And y'know, it's not like there's anything WRONG with being gay, it's just that I'd rather be the crime fighter that just happens to be gay than the gay crime fighter.  So, no cape.  Also, I had to change my catch phrase away from "Biitch, please!"
Posted by chrmun[/QUOTE]

Plusalso, have you never seen The Incredibles? Capes are dangerous.

RupertPenny

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:13d14964-33db-423c-90e7-dc4aa3b4d737">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]I'm going to put a picture of H with Magic Johnson, H with his Pan American Games medal and two pictures of my e-ring in my sig. Just to be clear about how amazing I think I am.
Posted by emilyinchile[/QUOTE]

<div>You might have to change your avatar from the Manolo pic though. Because that would just be a tad too much.</div>

MRSBJS

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:1f005699-49a2-4ade-a37a-43fea1cfd290">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]Special, now that you mention it, I did.  But I don't want to be a total creepster and send people things at random, either. 
Posted by Holly4212011[/QUOTE]

Holly feel free to send me random things...I think I got a Christmas card from you, too so you should have my address lol - I like jewelry and chocolate.

Beachy730

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:7f5cdb5d-d4f7-406f-b560-747f059f8908">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : Not the same thing.  Honestly, I think having your ring in your sig is dumb.  It's not for me, probably because I could not care less about them.  But when people AW their rings it's eyerolly. (to ME in case that wasn't clear.)
Posted by Megbo2012[/QUOTE]

<div>Sarcasm detection failure?</div><div>
</div><div>
</div>

Habs2Hart

FFS, I feel bad for the girl in the bachelorette thread who started it.  Now diva and friggen troll from here are posting at will about how she should do whatever the hell seh wants.  People suck.

Meegles4

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:807b45d3-a513-4c8c-9ca6-a4e14ae6c6ba">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]FFS, I feel bad for the girl in the bachelorette thread who started it.  Now diva and friggen troll from here are posting at will about how she should do whatever the hell seh wants.  People suck.
Posted by Habs2Hart[/QUOTE]

My thoughts exactly. It's a real party over there. Bring out the penis straws!

chelseamb11

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:3460f6fa-5e27-4aab-b8d3-231add9d3ee8">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : I'm offended by how many different Reds logos you have in your sig.  It comes across as very "I think my team is better than yours."  
Posted by dnbeach12[/QUOTE]

Oh lay off it. I have yet to see a poster on here (other than Stacey) post three different photos of the same thing in their sig pic.  That's pretty AW to me.  Midge has one photo. The wallpaper behind her does not count.

specialk84

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:1f005699-49a2-4ade-a37a-43fea1cfd290">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]Special, now that you mention it, I did.  But I don't want to be a total creepster and send people things at random, either. 
Posted by Holly4212011[/QUOTE]

<div>It's okay. Ranch is going to be creeped out by me in 1-2 business days.</div>

srfgirlie5

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:0a786e50-f8d3-4406-a089-14b64122ca05">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : Oh lay off it. I have yet to see a poster on here (other than Stacey) post three different photos of the same thing in their sig pic.  That's pretty AW to me.  Midge has one photo. The wallpaper behind her does not count.
Posted by chelseamb11[/QUOTE]

Pssst I think she was joking

Megbo2012

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:007c79bb-06cb-448c-9ee9-4afcb819b0a9">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : Sarcasm detection failure?
Posted by dnbeach12[/QUOTE]

<div>Apparently, but I honestly couldn't tell because there were several stupid comparisons. </div>

Beachy730

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:0a786e50-f8d3-4406-a089-14b64122ca05">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]In Response to Re: FFF : Oh lay off it. I have yet to see a poster on here (other than Stacey) post three different photos of the same thing in their sig pic.  That's pretty AW to me.  Midge has one photo. The wallpaper behind her does not count.
Posted by chelseamb11[/QUOTE]

<div>Holy eff.  STFU.</div>

specialk84

I think Chelsea missed the point.

Habs2Hart

Guys, crashing Ranchers wedding is not the right solution.

chrmun

I will be crashing Ranchers wedding in tights.

Beachy730

In Response to <a href="http://forums.theknot.com/Sites/theknot/Pages/Main.aspx/wedding-boards_etiquette_fff-90?plckFindPostKey=Cat:Wedding%20BoardsForum:9Discussion:d5565046-ffc2-4c3b-a2e8-8b4d971b6c89Post:5d46c321-3b44-43a9-b6b2-239d3f10d6a0">Re: FFF</a>:
[QUOTE]I think Chelsea missed the point.
Posted by specialk84[/QUOTE]

<div>Point</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>Chelsea and Meg</div>