Wedding Etiquette Forum

"PPD" is cruel

1235»

Re: "PPD" is cruel

  • Wow, this took a seriously fucked up turn. Does anybody honestly give a shit anymore if she children are born "out of wedlock" *eyeroll*. Big fucking deal. News flash: a woman's chastity doesn't dictate her entire worth anymore, we can do stuff like vote and go to college now. Crazy times I tell you!
    YASSSSS!  Preach, sista <3
    image
  • Where have I been.
    image
  • edited February 2015
    lc07 said:
    image

    Also, we may have gotten married at the same venue. I saw a previous comment of yours about having to pay $250 for a security guard if you have 50 people at your wedding.

    We might be venue buddies?

    ETA: I'm in SD. Got married just north of SD.



    Anniversary
    image

    image
  • lc07 said:
    image

    Also, we may have gotten married at the same venue. I saw a previous comment of yours about having to pay $250 for a security guard if you have 50 people at your wedding.

    We might be venue buddies?

    ETA: I'm in SD. Got married just north of SD.
    Your GIF cracked me up. I didn't know you're in SD, too! Cool! I got married downtown at the Skybox at DiamondView Tower. I think we had to have security there no matter how many people.
  • The only PPDs I support are Pepperoni Pizza Dippers or Pineapple Papaya Desserts.
    I though that said diapers. Bahahahahaaahhaha
    image
  • Mmmm diapers...
  • redoryx said:
    Could it be that neither father knew because neither one was in the picture?
    The OP says that nobody else knew, not even their fathers. That to me indicates the fathers were in the picture and kept in the dark. 
    Thank you for the clarification.
  • abcdevonn said:
    Also, right here:


    No one else knew, not even their fathers

    image

    That's pretty disgusting. Lying is never OK. 
    I had to re-read that wall of text because I admit, I skimmed. . . so I missed this gem.

    Call me skeptical, but I don't buy this story.  I find it hard to believe that a person who just received a terminal diagnosis would be worrying about such trivial shit as a wedding and reception.  To the point of hiding getting married for insurance purposes, especially hiding this marriage from her own father, all on the off chance that she survived she could have a big, blow out wedding later. 

    What other purpose would this couple have had of keeping their marriage a secret in the face of such a terrible and terminal diagnosis?  Would they have come clean with their fathers, family, and friends if she had actually died?

    And if this story actually is true, shame.on.all.of.you.
    I'm with you. In addition to the jacked up priorities, I don't think his insurance would have covered her treatment anyway. It would have been an excluded pre-existing condition up until very recently.

    It's just a little too convenient and heart string pulling, and I find it pretty hard to believe that there would be a couple and two mothers that are all so morally bankrupt as to pull off a lie like this. Usually there's someone in the mix with a conscience. 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------

    I too think this is MUD. I have known plenty of people with health insurance whose cancer treatments were not covered, for a variety of shit-tastic reasons. I sincerely doubt that her treatment would have been covered, especially, as Novella said, because until recently that was a "pre-existing condition" which companies could put outside of coverage. 

    And just like...what the fuck? Why leave out the poor dads? As if they weren't going through enough, probably worried out of their minds about the girl...if this isn't fake, it's the worst shit ever. I like how the fathers not knowing was supposed to make us be like "OoooOoooh, okay, well if the dads didn't know, then this just obvi wasn't a 'wedding'." 

    image

    ETA: Where do the boxes even go?

    Ah, I got stuck in the box!  @abcdevonn, I automatically worship you due to the Ehrmantraut gif.  That's all I can contribute at this time.  Gotta catch a flight!
  • Hmm. A new poster, but knows enough to make her user name "snowflakeftw" Uses gifs when challenged on her crazy and rude thinking. Calls people diminutive nicknames that she disagrees with. A proponent of being married before the baby comes, which leads me to believe that she would rush into a marriage if she were ever pregnant. Comments on Texas questions. Who wants to set the odds that this is a poster that we've seen before?
    Mein Gott.
    image
  • beethery said:
    Hmm. A new poster, but knows enough to make her user name "snowflakeftw" Uses gifs when challenged on her crazy and rude thinking. Calls people diminutive nicknames that she disagrees with. A proponent of being married before the baby comes, which leads me to believe that she would rush into a marriage if she were ever pregnant. Comments on Texas questions. Who wants to set the odds that this is a poster that we've seen before?
    Mein Gott.
    image

    She's gone now :)
    Hahahahahahhaha.
    image
  • Oh shit I knew it! Also that GIF is my life

     

    Also, seriously impressed with myself right now. I am declaring myself queen of calling out trolls for the day.

    I've told you before that you are my favorite but DO NOT FORGET IT EVER. BECAUSE IT IS TRUE.
    --

    I'm the fuck
    out.

    image

  • beethery said:
    Hmm. A new poster, but knows enough to make her user name "snowflakeftw" Uses gifs when challenged on her crazy and rude thinking. Calls people diminutive nicknames that she disagrees with. A proponent of being married before the baby comes, which leads me to believe that she would rush into a marriage if she were ever pregnant. Comments on Texas questions. Who wants to set the odds that this is a poster that we've seen before?
    Mein Gott.
    image

    She's gone now :)
    Damn, Girl!  You are like the CSI of BSC posters stalkers here!

    "Love is the one thing we're capable of perceiving that transcends time and space."


  • I'm going to a baby shower next Saturday. The couple is not married. It was a planned pregnancy, but they don't want to get married until his Father can come into the country. They could get married and have a fake wedding later. But that would be stupid.
    there is a term, and I mentioned it before for children who are born outside of a marriage

    You are a horrible human being.  I genuinely hope you never ever call a child that.
  • kellyem2kellyem2 member
    Third Anniversary 10 Comments 5 Love Its
    edited February 2015
    How the hell did we get from people pulling some kind of wedding/cancer scam to calling little kids bastards?

    There are no circumstances where it's ever OK to shame a kid, especially for something the kid had nothing to do with.
    Also, it's not the 1800s and it's really not that big of a deal if you *gasp* had SEX before marriage. Seriously. People need to get over themselves.
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards