Chit Chat
Options

Asking a friend to be an Usher instead of a Groomsmen

My fiancé had a very hard time choosing who he would ask to be his groomsmen because he wanted to ask more then the 4 groomsmen/ bridesmaids we agreed on. He still feels bad about limiting his groomsmen number and wants to ask 2 other friends to be ushers. We both think having ushers is a nice idea except that we don't want to offend anyone by asking them to be an usher instead of a groomsmen.

Has anyone been in a similar situation either about asking or being asked and how you felt? Thanks so much for the advice!

image

«13456710

Re: Asking a friend to be an Usher instead of a Groomsmen

  • Options
    Who cares if sides are even? I think it is kind of mean to not let your FI have the men he wants standing as GMs because it goes over the number of people alotted to each side.
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers
  • Options
    emmaaa said:
    Why can't he have 6 groomsmen?
    This. Just let the man have his 6 groomsman. Why would this be a problem?
  • Options

    In case it's unclear above...we agreed on 4 bridesmaids & 4 groomsman, not 4 total

    image

  • Options
    sam802 said:

    My fiancé had a very hard time choosing who he would ask to be his groomsmen because he wanted to ask more then the 4 groomsmen/ bridesmaids we agreed on. He still feels bad about limiting his groomsmen number and wants to ask 2 other friends to be ushers. We both think having ushers is a nice idea except that we don't want to offend anyone by asking them to be an usher instead of a groomsmen.

    Has anyone been in a similar situation either about asking or being asked and how you felt? Thanks so much for the advice!


    Anniversary

    image
  • Options
    If he's as close with the 2 as he is with the 4, he should go ahead and ask them all to be GM. If they're not as close as the other guys though, they likely won't be offended by being ushers. 

    One of H's friends was really excited to be asked to be an usher, but he never would have expected to be a GM.

    image
    image
  • Options
    sam802 said:

    In case it's unclear above...we agreed on 4 bridesmaids & 4 groomsman, not 4 total


    I think you were perfectly clear. If he wants 6 GM let him have 6 GM. It is really controlling to not let him have his nearest and dearest up there because you are worried the sides won't be even. Why did you only want 4 and 4 to begin with?
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers
  • Options
    sam802 said:

    My fiancé had a very hard time choosing who he would ask to be his groomsmen because he wanted to ask more then the 4 groomsmen/ bridesmaids we agreed on. He still feels bad about limiting his groomsmen number and wants to ask 2 other friends to be ushers. We both think having ushers is a nice idea except that we don't want to offend anyone by asking them to be an usher instead of a groomsmen.

    Has anyone been in a similar situation either about asking or being asked and how you felt? Thanks so much for the advice!


    Also JIC.
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers
  • Options

    We both want to have the same amount on each side of us and it's not possible for me to think of 2 more girls...I actually have 3 bridesmaids and 1 bridesman that make up my party.

    image

  • Options
    sam802 said:

    We both want to have the same amount on each side of us and it's not possible for me to think of 2 more girls...I actually have 3 bridesmaids and 1 bridesman that make up my party.

    So? Sides don't have to be even. You could rethink this. If he is that close to the guys, let him have them.
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers
  • Options
    sarawifenowsarawifenow member
    First Comment First Anniversary First Answer 5 Love Its
    edited October 2014

    I think it was @Maggie0829 who had uneven sides (more GM than BM) and her pics are GORG! Correct me if I am wrong, Maggie.

     

    ETA: I am sure there are tons more Knotties who have done this, too. Maggie is just who popped into my head.

    Daisypath Anniversary tickers
  • Options
    Sides don't have to be even. If he would call any of the six at 3am to help him bury a dead body, he should have all 6 standing with him.
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers
  • Options

    I'm not limiting the number to 4. we both agreed to 4 each. he's having a really hard time picking 4 out of 6. 

    image

  • Options
    sam802 said:

    I'm not limiting the number to 4. we both agreed to 4 each. he's having a really hard time picking 4 out of 6. 


    Then have all 6. How long until your wedding?
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers
  • Options
    sam802 said:

    I'm not limiting the number to 4. we both agreed to 4 each. he's having a really hard time picking 4 out of 6. 

    Well then I don't know how much we can help you.  
    Anniversary

    image
  • Options
    This isn't about having more then 4 groomsmen. It's about asking two other friends to be ushers instead of a groomsmen.

    image

  • Options
    sam802 said:
    This isn't about having more then 4 groomsmen. It's about asking two other friends to be ushers instead of a groomsmen.
    OK, and if I was one of the friends that didn't make the cut, I would be offended.
    Anniversary

    image
  • Options
    sam802 said:
    This isn't about having more then 4 groomsmen. It's about asking two other friends to be ushers instead of a groomsmen.
    If the number 4 and even sides are more important to you than close friendships are, then yes it's offensive to be asked to be an usher instead. Instead of the usher position being an honor to them, it's a consolation prize. There's no nice way to do it. Your FI's friends will be rightfully hurt and pissed off.

    image
    image
  • Options
    sam802 said:
    This isn't about having more then 4 groomsmen. It's about asking two other friends to be ushers instead of a groomsmen.

    Just say, "will you be an usher?" Since you aren't willing to have uneven sides, that is going to be your only option. I still think that if your FI has 6 friends he is that close to, you are both doing those friendships an injustice by not letting them stand next to your FI as GMs.
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers
  • Options
    It's ok not to have equal sides.   The point of the wedding party is to have those closest to you be by your side as you say your vows.  If his closest = 6 and your closest = 4, then just let it be. If he's not as close to these two, then it's a different story, but don't leave them out just for the sake of equal sides
  • Options
    sam802 said:
    This isn't about having more then 4 groomsmen. It's about asking two other friends to be ushers instead of a groomsmen.
    Okay, then I think that's a bad idea and I would be offended. That's just like having 'honorary bridesmaids'. It's saying "Sorry you didn't quite make the cut but here's a made up job as a consolation prize".
    Anniversary



  • Options
    cafarriecafarrie member
    First Answer 5 Love Its First Comment Name Dropper
    edited October 2014
    I don't think they would be offended to be ushers.  My DH was in the same boat.  We each had 5 people standing with us and had 2 friends that we are both very close to.  He would have felt comfortable with one of them as a groomsman and not the other, but usually when we see them, it's the four of us - so he felt strange asking one over the other.  So we asked them to be ushers since they're very close to both of us.  They were so excited!  We included them in lots of pictures and everything else the BP was involved in.  Ended up being great!
  • Options
    For what it's worth, I know the sides don't HAVE to be even - but I think it look's really silly and I'm kind of OCD about things being symmetrical :).  That's just me though, and I would never think twice if someone had a different number.  
  • Options
    cafarrie said:
    I don't think they would be offended to be ushers.  My DH was in the same boat.  We each had 5 people standing with us and had 2 friends that we are both very close to.  He would have felt comfortable with one of them as a groomsman and not the other, but usually when we see them, it's the four of us - so he felt strange asking one over the other.  So we asked them to be ushers since they're very close to both of us.  They were so excited!  We included them in lots of pictures and everything else the BP was involved in.  Ended up being great!

    See I don't get this. It's like saying "We are going to include you in everything the BP is included in, but you are not actually in the BP. Thanks!" It just doesn't make sense to me.
    Daisypath Anniversary tickers
  • Options
    cafarrie said:
    I don't think they would be offended to be ushers.  My DH was in the same boat.  We each had 5 people standing with us and had 2 friends that we are both very close to.  He would have felt comfortable with one of them as a groomsman and not the other, but usually when we see them, it's the four of us - so he felt strange asking one over the other.  So we asked them to be ushers since they're very close to both of us.  They were so excited!  We included them in lots of pictures and everything else the BP was involved in.  Ended up being great!
    I think the difference here is it was easier for you to make that split. In the OP's case, the 6 friends are all equally close or else her FI wouldn't be having such a hard time choosing between them. 

    image
    image
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards