It’s time to address another very common question from TK posters. Every week, many new members find the Etiquette or Reception Ideas forums and post something similar to the following:
“Hi everyone! I’m just starting to plan my wedding and I’m looking for ideas on how to make it really special. My FI and I were married at the courthouse a few months ago, but now it’s time to plan our real wedding!”
or “Hi, I’m wondering how to plan my formal wedding - where do I start? We signed our marriage license and made it legal last year because my FI lost his job and needed insurance coverage, but we didn’t get to have the wedding we always dreamed of.”
or
“My FI and I were legally married last year in secret because he was being deployed and we wanted to make sure I was covered by his military benefits and would be notified immediately if anything happened to him - now he’s back and we’re getting married for real! Any cute ideas for how to ask my friend to be my Maid of Honor?”
Hopefully, you get the idea. Couple elopes/has a very small, informal wedding for (insert extenuating circumstance here) and now they want a do-over. Here at TK, we often refer to this wedding do-over as a PPD, or Pretty Princess Day.
Let’s go over the many reasons why having a wedding do-over, or PPD, is never a good idea - PPD FAQ TIME!
Is it okay to have a second/better/real wedding if my original wedding was a disappointment/emergency/elopement? No.
But my original wedding was just me, my FI and a JOP - it was unromantic, none of my friends and family were there, and I regret it! Unfortunately, this is a hazard of choosing to rush and get married without considering how you might feel about it later. The fact is, you are already married - the day that you stood in front of the JOP was the day that you married your husband. In addition, disregarding JOP weddings as "not real" or not good enough is incredibly insulting to both those couples who choose to have courthouse weddings and are happy with that choice, and to same sex couples who just want to have the privilege to have that ceremony and all of the benefits that come with it, but can't in many states. A civil wedding is every bit as real as a religious one. A courthouse wedding is just as good as a country-club wedding.But, it didn’t feel like a wedding! It didn’t have the trappings of a Western wedding, true, but it was no less a wedding. Marriage is a legally binding contract - the moment that you enter into the contract, you are married. Whether you had a fancy dress, or a bouquet, or a limousine ride, or a first dance in front of your loved ones is irrelevant - the only thing required on a wedding day is that a legal marriage is performed.
But, no one got to see it, now they can! No, they can't. They weren't there when you got married. That ship has sailed. Now, all you are offering them is a cheap re-enactment of that moment. It isn't the same and it can't be the same. While you may regret it, it's done, own your choice.
But, that’s not fair. I deserve to have the wedding I always dreamed of! It may seem unfair, but assuming you married after the age of 18 under your own power and authority, you made this choice. You could have waited, but you chose to get married when and how you did, and you should own that decision and move on. Also, remember that a wedding, complete with all the little details we all love, is not a right or a requirement. It is a luxury.
But, we were married at the courthouse and I always wanted to be married in my church! Once again, you made the choice to be married in a civil ceremony. No one will judge you for going to your place of worship and asking that your marriage be blessed/considered valid/etc under the tenets of your religion. But do it privately, or with a few close family members, and don't call it a "wedding" or have any of the other trappings of a "wedding." It's not appropriate or necessary. if you are looking for validation from your religion, then get it, but don't use it as an excuse for a do-over.
BUT, it wasn’t a choice really. I needed insurance/housing/(insert other benefit here)! Marrying for any one of these reasons does not make you any less married. IF you choose to get married quickly in order to gain insurance coverage, housing, or any other federal/legal benefit, the day you do so is your wedding day. You are not entitled to a do-over - even if you regret the decision.
Well, whatever, my friends and family love me and none of them has a problem with this! Be careful here. Peruse the boards for a few hours and you will find many, many stories of friends and family who were guests or otherwise involved in a wedding do-over who never said a single word to the bride & groom but still resent them/took issue with it/think less of them now for doing it/just generally had a bad time. Your friends and family will usually keep their mouths shut in this situation - not because they condone your actions, but because they love you and they don’t want to hurt you. Give them the same treatment in return, and don’t do this to them.
No one knows we are married - what they don’t know won’t hurt them. This will be our only wedding for them. This is possibly the worst case PPD scenario. Lying to your friends and family will come back to bite you every time. People will find out, and they will be angry/hurt/resentful. They will hold it against you indefinitely. Do yourself a favor - these are the people you love most in the world - be honest with them. They will feel tricked and insulted if you have a PPD and don’t tell them - even moreso than if you do it without lying.
Okay, I see your point, but I am still really sad that I didn't get to celebrate my marriage with my friends and family in the style that I would have liked to! Luckily, you still have some options. You can have a party celebrating your marriage - just take care to avoid making it look like a stage re-enactment of your wedding. It would be inappropriate to have a ceremony, big poofy white wedding dress, wedding party, tosses, cake cutting or first dances since you were already married. You can, however, throw a big party for everyone you love with a great meal, music and dancing. Invite your guests to join you at a celebration of your marriage, not a wedding. If it's been awhile (normally at least 5 years, frequently 10 or more) you can host a vow renewal.
Talking Points:The day that you were legally married was your wedding day. You are not entitled to a second one unless your current marriage ends and you remarry.
The man you legally married is now your husband, stop calling him your FI/fiance.
No one is entitled to a big, fancy wedding - if that is what you want, plan it and execute it properly. Don’t take a shortcut and try to take it back later.
Do not lie to your friends and family - they will resent you for it, even if they never tell you.
Congratulations, you’re already married - we hope you have a wonderful, long, happy marriage!
As always, remember that this was written by a stranger who has no ill will toward you or reason to lie. It was written by someone who has been invited to a wedding do-over and was not happy about it. It was written by someone who knew many other guests at that wedding do-over and heard first-hand how unhappy they were about it. Remember that your friends and family love you and will lie to your face to keep you happy.
If you don't believe me, just ask Miss Manners!
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2011-07-23/lifestyle/35237685_1_civil-ceremony-anniversaries-bridesmaids or http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2010/03/11/DI2010031103184.html "State of slight confusion:My wife's best friend got married nearly a year ago. The bride wore beautiful white wedding dress and carried flowers. A small number of friends were in attendance and a meal followed. Pictures were taken and posted online. The problem? This ceremony took place at a courthouse (there were insurance issues that needed to be addressed ASAP). So, this spring, a bit over a year later, they are holding a "real wedding," complete with another ceremony (and large reception). My wife thinks this is perfectly normal, but it seems odd to me. Is this the new normal? Thanks for your reply.
Miss Manners: It's not a "real wedding," because these people are already married. But there are many who regard weddings as a chance to indulge in ego-fests and want as many as possible (without the trouble of divorce), so they stage re-enactments."
I seriously think you should write a book. "How to plan a wedding so the wedding ninjas don't get you!" Really though, I wish there was a book like this. Aside from Emily Post and Ms. Manners I mean.
After 6 years and 2 boys, finally tying the knot on October 27th, 2013!
Oh, maybe add a bit about what you *can* do instead of a PPD. Like how its okay to plan a huge party to celebrate being married. Have a DJ, great food, lots to drink. Have a special dance. But no poufy dress, no wedding cake (a regular cake will do), no "first" dances, no ceremony re-do, no showers, no registries.
After 6 years and 2 boys, finally tying the knot on October 27th, 2013!
But I don't see the problem if someone wants to get dressed up and celebrate the marriage that has already taken place. If it's marketed correctly, I don't think loved ones would refuse to attend. I cold wear my wedding dress to mow my lawn in if I wanted to.
Your announcement is just... rather abrupt for people who might come here looking to make the best out of the choices they have made. Maybe a more helpful blog on this topic is in order.
This is great! When addressing ppds I also like to being up how disregarding JOP weddings as "not real" is incredibly insulting to both those couples who choose to have courthouse weddings and are happy with that choice, and those same sex couples who just want to have the privledge to have that ceremony and all of the benefits that come with it, but can't in several states. That was one if the points that really drove it home for me in my detest for ppds.
But I don't see the problem if someone wants to get dressed up and celebrate the marriage that has already taken place. If it's marketed correctly, I don't think loved ones would refuse to attend. I cold wear my wedding dress to mow my lawn in if I wanted to.
Your announcement is just... rather abrupt for people who might come here looking to make the best out of the choices they have made. Maybe a more helpful blog on this topic is in order.
Wear your wedding dress to mow your lawn if you want - just don't wear it to stage a reenactment of your wedding.
And as always, every person who reads this is 100% entitled to continue with whatever plan they've put in place - words of caution are just that, words of caution. It's advice from a non-biased third party who has no skin in the game of your (general) life.
This is great!
When addressing ppds I also like to being up how disregarding JOP weddings as "not real" is incredibly insulting to both those couples who choose to have courthouse weddings and are happy with that choice, and those same sex couples who just want to have the privledge to have that ceremony and all of the benefits that come with it, but can't in several states. That was one if the points that really drove it home for me in my detest for ppds.
I think what you are doing here is making a number of sweeping generalizations that you have no right to make. Plenty of people go to the courthouse and get married first and then exchange vows later in front of their families and friends. How do you think destination weddings work? Big Wedding Events are logistical nightmares and sometimes real life has a way of getting in the way of everything you have planned. Timelines don't match up. This person isn't available on that date. Your venue burned down. You had to move. You had everything planned and then X tragedy happened. Are you trying to argue that these people don't have the right to a wedding, the way they planned it? Or at all?
You are. You're saying they CHOSE to get married that way. I don't think so. Some? Yes. But most? Probably not. And neither one of those parties exclusively "rushes' into those decisions and then regrets it later.Your waxing on about deception and mistakes and do-overs is in poor taste and smacks of privilege.
I could make a number of assumptions about why everyone is so adamant about these antiquated concepts of weddings or so butthurt about these so called "do-overs" (a term that I neither agree with nor condone). But that too would be in poor taste. Personally I would advise everyone to get off their high horses and to stop being the wedding police and let some folks live and celebrate however the heck they want.
I think what you are doing here is making a number of sweeping generalizations that you have no right to make. Plenty of people go to the courthouse and get married first and then exchange vows later in front of their families and friends. How do you think destination weddings work? Big Wedding Events are logistical nightmares and sometimes real life has a way of getting in the way of everything you have planned. Timelines don't match up. This person isn't available on that date. Your venue burned down. You had to move. You had everything planned and then X tragedy happened. Are you trying to argue that these people don't have the right to a wedding, the way they planned it? Or at all?
You are. You're saying they CHOSE to get married that way. I don't think so. Some? Yes. But most? Probably not. And neither one of those parties exclusively "rushes' into those decisions and then regrets it later.Your waxing on about deception and mistakes and do-overs is in poor taste and smacks of privilege.
I could make a number of assumptions about why everyone is so adamant about these antiquated concepts of weddings or so butthurt about these so called "do-overs" (a term that I neither agree with nor condone). But that too would be in poor taste. Personally I would advise everyone to get off their high horses and to stop being the wedding police and let some folks live and celebrate however the heck they want.
I know plenty of people who have DW and do it all legally at the time they say their vows. Typically DW work just like local weddings. For those couples having a fake ceremony at their DW they are doing it wrong.
Yes. People are choosing to get married that way. Unless they are held at gun point and forced into marrying each other, the couple is deciding together in an adult manner to get married without the bells and whistles.
Also, we are not on our high-horses. We make up the general public and when their is a general consensus that PPD or "fake do-overs" is considered in poor taste people should take note and realize that that is how their guests may feel as well. But what is different between us and your guests is that we don't know you and have no problem telling you, very bluntly, that your idea is shitty. Your guests won't tell you that because they are friends and family and do not want to hurt your feelings, but you better believe that they are side-eyeing your plans or talking about it behind your backs.
I think what you are doing here is making a number of sweeping generalizations that you have no right to make. Plenty of people go to the courthouse and get married first and then exchange vows later in front of their families and friends. How do you think destination weddings work? Big Wedding Events are logistical nightmares and sometimes real life has a way of getting in the way of everything you have planned. Timelines don't match up. This person isn't available on that date. Your venue burned down. You had to move. You had everything planned and then X tragedy happened. Are you trying to argue that these people don't have the right to a wedding, the way they planned it? Or at all?
You are. You're saying they CHOSE to get married that way. I don't think so. Some? Yes. But most? Probably not. And neither one of those parties exclusively "rushes' into those decisions and then regrets it later.Your waxing on about deception and mistakes and do-overs is in poor taste and smacks of privilege.
I could make a number of assumptions about why everyone is so adamant about these antiquated concepts of weddings or so butthurt about these so called "do-overs" (a term that I neither agree with nor condone). But that too would be in poor taste. Personally I would advise everyone to get off their high horses and to stop being the wedding police and let some folks live and celebrate however the heck they want.
1. I would be hella pissed if I took time, spent money, and flew abroad to watch people pretend to get married. You want pictures of you in a wedding dress on a tropical island? Bring your dress on your honeymoon and hire a photographer. Don't ask your guests to spend their vacation time/money so they can be props for your photoshoot.
2. You JOPed it and now you feel like you missed out on the big celebration? Host a party! Celebrate! Just don't reenact your wedding for everyone who missed it. Why is this so hard to understand?
I think what you are doing here is making a number of sweeping generalizations that you have no right to make. Plenty of people go to the courthouse and get married first and then exchange vows later in front of their families and friends. How do you think destination weddings work? Big Wedding Events are logistical nightmares and sometimes real life has a way of getting in the way of everything you have planned. Timelines don't match up. This person isn't available on that date. Your venue burned down. You had to move. You had everything planned and then X tragedy happened. Are you trying to argue that these people don't have the right to a wedding, the way they planned it? Or at all?
You are. You're saying they CHOSE to get married that way. I don't think so. Some? Yes. But most? Probably not. And neither one of those parties exclusively "rushes' into those decisions and then regrets it later.Your waxing on about deception and mistakes and do-overs is in poor taste and smacks of privilege.
I could make a number of assumptions about why everyone is so adamant about these antiquated concepts of weddings or so butthurt about these so called "do-overs" (a term that I neither agree with nor condone). But that too would be in poor taste. Personally I would advise everyone to get off their high horses and to stop being the wedding police and let some folks live and celebrate however the heck they want.
At destination weddings, the couple is married in the place where the destination wedding takes place - otherwise it's just a honeymoon complete with fake wedding ceremony.
Assuming that everyone is entitled to their fantasy wedding sounds a lot more privileged than saying "you get one day/"
Unfortunately for guests the world over, there are no wedding police. Do what you want, just don't claim it's not rude or that people won't care, because it is and they will.
I feel incredibly bad that everyone on here has such judgmental friends and families with such narrow world views. For everyone to be so concerned with lying and deception and assumed gift grabbing when all you're trying to do is celebrate your love; it's troubling really. All the focus on the technicalities and the specifics seems to be at odds with the bigger picture but different strokes I suppose.
I feel incredibly bad that everyone on here has such judgmental friends and families with such narrow world views. For everyone to be so concerned with lying and deception and assumed gift grabbing when all you're trying to do is celebrate your love; it's troubling really. All the focus on the technicalities and the specifics seems to be at odds with the bigger picture but different strokes I suppose.
There's nothing narrow-minded about not enjoying wedding reenactments. I love seeing two people who love each other get married - it's beautiful, and sweet, and inspiring. Seeing it replayed isn't beautiful, or sweet, or inspiring - it's insipid.
I think what you are doing here is making a number of sweeping generalizations that you have no right to make. Plenty of people go to the courthouse and get married first and then exchange vows later in front of their families and friends. How do you think destination weddings work? Big Wedding Events are logistical nightmares and sometimes real life has a way of getting in the way of everything you have planned. Timelines don't match up. This person isn't available on that date. Your venue burned down. You had to move. You had everything planned and then X tragedy happened. Are you trying to argue that these people don't have the right to a wedding, the way they planned it? Or at all?
You are. You're saying they CHOSE to get married that way. I don't think so. Some? Yes. But most? Probably not. And neither one of those parties exclusively "rushes' into those decisions and then regrets it later.Your waxing on about deception and mistakes and do-overs is in poor taste and smacks of privilege.
I could make a number of assumptions about why everyone is so adamant about these antiquated concepts of weddings or so butthurt about these so called "do-overs" (a term that I neither agree with nor condone). But that too would be in poor taste. Personally I would advise everyone to get off their high horses and to stop being the wedding police and let some folks live and celebrate however the heck they want.
I think someone ^^^ had a PPD and is trying to justify it.
Also @meeglins - be aware that at least 17 people who have read this today disagree with you - what if one of those 17 is your best friend, or your aunt, or a beloved cousin? Do you really want to risk them thinking less of you because you just had to have a better wedding?
Everyone agrees that tragedies and emergencies and crazy life things happen that change our plans - some of us understand that when life changes our plans, we adjust and move on. Some others think they missed out, or were entitled to something they didn't get, and refuse to accept that sometimes being a grownup means you don't always get what you want.
I feel incredibly bad that everyone on here has such judgmental friends and families with such narrow world views. For everyone to be so concerned with lying and deception and assumed gift grabbing when all you're trying to do is celebrate your love; it's troubling really. All the focus on the technicalities and the specifics seems to be at odds with the bigger picture but different strokes I suppose.
I find it troubling that you don't see a problem with lying to friends and family. There is nothing real in a do-over wedding except the costs to the guest. Frankly, I find it insulting that a JOP wedding isn't a "real" wedding to some people. Does that make my parents any less married?
I'd like to hear from destination wedding brides about how they actually did it. I know some who have their ceremony "legally" performed in the foreign country, and some who have the "legal" ceremony performed right before or after the destination celebration. I think saying those couples are "doing it wrong" is a little silly, though I agree that you should never lie to your friends and family.
We are not having my "legal" paperwork done at my destination wedding because we don't want a stranger performing the religious ceremony which is a legal requirement in the country we selected. We love the religious aspect to the union of marriage, and we want our minister to perform it at our destination so the ceremony is personalized. This means the paperwork cannot take place in the foreign country, and we are ok with that - like you said, grumble, we are CHOOSING to have it our own way.
Our friends and family know what we are doing and have said they are excited to see how personalized our ceremony will be. All the naysayers out there can say our guests are lying to my face, and maybe that's true (you never technically know, right?)... but they know our wedding/marriage plan, and if they think we're "doing it wrong" and are offended, then I feel bad that they might be so caught up in the negativity that they may not enjoy themselves as much as they might if they just relaxed and celebrated with us.
Anyway, on a HAPPIER note, we leave 2 weeks from tomorrow and we are SO EXCITED
Having just gone through a lot of super fun with US Customs and Border Patrol, would it have been easier if we were already married so I could have a green card? Yes. But we want a wedding with our friends and family present. Being slightly inconvenienced by my work visa application is not a reason to have a PPD.
Re: Legally married, now having a "real" wedding? Stop here first! (AKA, the PPD FAQ thread)
After 6 years and 2 boys, finally tying the knot on October 27th, 2013!
After 6 years and 2 boys, finally tying the knot on October 27th, 2013!
When addressing ppds I also like to being up how disregarding JOP weddings as "not real" is incredibly insulting to both those couples who choose to have courthouse weddings and are happy with that choice, and those same sex couples who just want to have the privledge to have that ceremony and all of the benefits that come with it, but can't in several states. That was one if the points that really drove it home for me in my detest for ppds.
Thanks for creating this. You do such a good job with these stickies.
2. You JOPed it and now you feel like you missed out on the big celebration? Host a party! Celebrate! Just don't reenact your wedding for everyone who missed it. Why is this so hard to understand?